Paper · 1998 · Weed Science

Effects of pest and soil management systems on weed dynamics in potato

Eric R. Gallandt; Matt Liebman; Sue Corson; et al.

16
claims
28
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Results from the “Potato Ecosystem Project,” a cropping systems study in northern Maine, were used to test the hypothesis that greater reliance on organic nutrient sources and less reliance on synthetic fertilizer sources can benefit weed management efforts. ‘Atlantic’ potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation within a factorial arrangement of three pest management systems, two soil management systems, and both rotation entry points. Weed control in the conventional (CONV) pest management system relied on full rates of herbicides, whereas the biointensive (BIO) system relied exclusively on cultivation. The reduced input (RI) pest management system relied on cultivation in 1991 and 1992 and on 50% of standard herbicide rates plus cultivation from 1993 to 1995. The two soil management systems, unamended (barley/red clover rotation crop; 1× synthetic fertilizer for potato) and amended (pea/oat/hairy vetch green manure rotation crop; manure, compost, and 0.5× synthetic fertilizer for potato) contrasted practices typical for the region to those designed to achieve rapid improvements in soil quality. Midseason weed biomass in potato was dominated by common lambsquarters. In 1991 and 1992, weed biomass in potato was least in the CONV system and did not differ between the RI and BIO systems. In 1993, weeds in both RI and CONV potatoes were effectively suppressed below the level measured in the BIO system. Soil management had no effect on weed biomass from 1991 to 1993 but became an important factor affecting weeds in the BIO system in 1994 and 1995. Weed biomass was 77% lower in 1994 and 72% lower in 1995 in the amended soil management system than in the unamended system. No significant yield loss due to weeds was detected in the 1994 BIO system, but in 1995 yield loss due to weeds was 37% in the unamended system compared to 12% in the amended system. Soil management effects on weeds in the 1994 BIO pest management system carried through to the following season's germinable seed bank. Density of germinable common lambsquarters seed (0 to 10 cm soil depth) in the 1995 BIO system was 4,082 m −2 in the unamended soil management system compared to 1,280 m −2 in the amended soil management system. We suggest that organic amendments and green manure promote a potato crop better able to compete with weeds and that these inputs be considered as potentially important components of integrated weed management systems that have minimal reliance on herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common lambsquarters dominated midseason weed biomass in potato.

Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
weed biomass in potato was dominated by common lambsquarterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Midseason weed biomass in potato was dominated by common lambsquarters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1991–1992, conventional management had the least weed biomass.

Treatment
CONV systeme0
Outcome
weed biomass in potatoe0
Direction
leaste0
Qualifier
In 1991 and 1992e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1991 and 1992, weed biomass in potato was least in the CONV system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1247 · show in text ↑
e1

“the conventional (CONV) pest management system relied on full rates of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–529 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1991–1992, weed biomass did not differ between RI and BIO systems.

Treatment
RIe0
Outcome
weed biomass in potatoe0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
BIO systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed biomass in potato was least in the CONV system and did not differ between the RI and BIO systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1297 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1993, RI and conventional systems suppressed weeds below BIO levels.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
RI and CONVe0
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
suppressed belowe0
Comparator
BIO systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1993, weeds in both RI and CONV potatoes were effectively suppressed below the level measured in the BIO system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil management had no effect on weed biomass during 1991–1993.

Treatment
Soil managemente0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
from 1991 to 1993e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil management had no effect on weed biomass from 1991 to 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1478 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil management affected weeds in BIO during 1994 and 1995.

Treatment
Soil managemente0
Outcome
weeds in the BIO systeme0
Qualifier
in 1994 and 1995e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil management had no effect on weed biomass from 1991 to 1993 but became an important factor affecting weeds in the BIO system in 1994 and 1995”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1560 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amended soil management lowered weed biomass by 77% in 1994.

Treatment
amended soil management systeme0
Outcome
Weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
77%e0
Qualifier
in 1994e0
Comparator
unamended systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed biomass was 77% lower in 1994 and 72% lower in 1995 in the amended soil management system than in the unamended system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1685 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amended soil management lowered weed biomass by 72% in 1995.

Treatment
amended soil management systeme0
Outcome
Weed biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
72%e0
Qualifier
in 1995e0
Comparator
unamended systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed biomass was 77% lower in 1994 and 72% lower in 1995 in the amended soil management system than in the unamended system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1685 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant weed-related yield loss was detected in the 1994 BIO system.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield loss due to weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant yield loss due to weeds was detected in the 1994 BIO system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1761 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-related yield loss in 1995 was 37% under unamended soil management.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield loss due to weedse0
Value
37%e0
Setting
unamended systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1995 yield loss due to weeds was 37% in the unamended system compared to 12% in the amended system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1868 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-related yield loss in 1995 was 12% under amended soil management.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
yield loss due to weedse0
Value
12%e0
Setting
amended systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1995 yield loss due to weeds was 37% in the unamended system compared to 12% in the amended system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1868 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil management effects in the 1994 BIO system carried into the following season’s germinable seed bank.

Treatment
Soil managemente0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
following season's germinable seed banke0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil management effects on weeds in the 1994 BIO pest management system carried through to the following season's germinable seed bank”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–2004 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germinable common lambsquarters seed density in 1995 BIO was 4,082 m −2 under unamended management.

Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
Density of germinable common lambsquarters seede0
Value
4,082 m −2e0
Setting
unamended soil management systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Density of germinable common lambsquarters seed (0 to 10 cm soil depth) in the 1995 BIO system was 4,082 m −2 in the unamended soil management system compared to 1,280 m −2 in the amended soil management system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2216 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germinable common lambsquarters seed density in 1995 BIO was 1,280 m −2 under amended management.

Interactor
common lambsquartersChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
Density of germinable common lambsquarters seede0
Value
1,280 m −2e0
Setting
amended soil management systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Density of germinable common lambsquarters seed (0 to 10 cm soil depth) in the 1995 BIO system was 4,082 m −2 in the unamended soil management system compared to 1,280 m −2 in the amended soil management system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2216 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato was grown in a 2-yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–305 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest organic amendments and green manure promote a potato crop better able to compete with weeds.

Treatment
organic amendments and green manuree0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
potato crop better able to compete with weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic amendments and green manure promote a potato crop better able to compete with weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2234–2325 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend organic amendments and green manure as components of integrated weed management with minimal herbicide reliance.

Treatment
organic amendments and green manuree1
Outcome
potentially important components of integrated weed management systems that have minimal reliance on herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these inputs be considered as potentially important components of integrated weed management systems that have minimal reliance on herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2335–2476 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic amendments and green manure promote a potato crop better able to compete with weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2234–2325 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · weed · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.