Paper · 1997 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association

A stochastic model to study the control of grazing systems

L.G. Barioni; C.K. Dake; W.J. Parker

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Most modelling research into grazing management has focused on planning. However, if target outcomes for pastures, animals and profit are to be realised, planning and control must be closely linked. Control is required if actual outcomes are likely to deviate from those planned. This may be because of: variability in uncontrollable variables (e.g., the weather); imprecision in implementation (including timeliness); inaccurate measurement of outcomes (i.e., sensor errors); and errors in prediction during the planning process. A dynamic grazing system model was used with a genetic optimising algorithm to simulate the outcomes for different control strategies for a sheep farmlet. The optimum control sequencing for pasture allowance, nitrogen application, lamb drafting weight and supplementation was investigated. Optimum pasture cover levels were similar to those recommended to farmers, except for winter when higher allowances were suggested. Sensor errors for pasture measurement were shown not to have a significant financial cost to farmers if recommended measurement techniques are closely followed. Keywords: grazing control, grazing management, grazing system model, pasture measurement, system optimisation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum simulated pasture cover levels were similar to those recommended to farmers.

Taxon
pasturee1
Outcome
Optimum pasture cover levelse1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
those recommended to farmerse1

Verbatim

e1

“Optimum pasture cover levels were similar to those recommended to farmers, except for winter when higher allowances were suggested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–951 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In winter, the simulated optimum pasture allowance was higher than recommended.

Taxon
pasturee1
Outcome
allowancese1
Direction
highere1
Setting
wintere1

Verbatim

e1

“Optimum pasture cover levels were similar to those recommended to farmers, except for winter when higher allowances were suggested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sensor errors in pasture measurement did not have a significant financial cost to farmers when recommended techniques were followed.

Taxon
pasturee2
Treatment
Sensor errors for pasture measuremente2
Outcome
financial coste2
Qualifier
if recommended measurement techniques are closely followede2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e2

“Sensor errors for pasture measurement were shown not to have a significant financial cost to farmers if recommended measurement techniques are closely followed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1112 · show in text ↑