Paper · 1996 · HortScience

IMPACT OF NUTRIENT REPLENISHMENT ON HYDROPONIC SWEETPOTATO CULTURE

Audrey A. Trotman; P. David; D. Mortley; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a greenhouse experiment, the effect of the addition of higher levels of potassium (K) in the replenishment stock used to supply nutrients in a nutrient film technique system was examined. For this study, `TU-82-155' sweetpotato was grown hydroponically for 120 days under four nutrient application/replenishment treatments: 1) REG—solution was changed at 14-day intervals and volume allowed to fluctuate; 2) MHH—replenishment with 10× concentrate of a modified half Hoagland solution (MHH) or with water to regain set volume (30.4 liters) and maintain set point of electrical conductivity (EC, 1050–1500 μmho); 3) MHH + 2K—daily replenishment with 10× concentrate of a modified half Hoagland solution (MHH) or with water to regain the set volume and adjust EC to 1400 followed by application of 50 ml of a 2K stock solution to an EC of 1500; 4) MHH/2K—replenishment with 10× concentrate of a modified half Hoagland solution that incorporated the 2K component or with water to regain set volume (30.4 liters) and maintain set point of electrical conductivity (EC, 105–1500 μmho). The storage root yield (g fresh weight per plant) was significantly higher when the 2K treatment was incorporated with the 10× MHH stock. The storage root yield averaged 324.8 g/plant compared with a yield of 289.6 and 252.9 g/plant, respectively, for the REG and MHH nutrient application protocol. As in earlier experiments, the MHH treatment was comparable to the REG protocol, validating the use of a replenishment approach for nutrient supply in hydroponic sweetpotato culture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating 2K in the MHH stock significantly raised storage root yield relative to REG and MHH protocols.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase2
Material
TU-82-155e2
Treatment
2K treatmente0
Outcome
storage root yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
324.8 g/plante1
Comparator
REG and MHH nutrient application protocole1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The storage root yield (g fresh weight per plant) was significantly higher when the 2K treatment was incorporated with the 10× MHH stock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1219 · show in text ↑
e1

“The storage root yield averaged 324.8 g/plant compared with a yield of 289.6 and 252.9 g/plant, respectively, for the REG and MHH nutrient application protocol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1380 · show in text ↑
e2

“`TU-82-155' sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MHH yield was comparable to REG yield.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
MHH treatmente0
Outcome
comparablee0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
REG protocole0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the MHH treatment was comparable to the REG protocol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1460 · show in text ↑
e1

“`TU-82-155' sweetpotato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–230 · show in text ↑