Paper · 1977 · Annals of Botany

The Influence of the Length of the Growth Period and Planting Density on Total Crop Yield

A. BARNES

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The growth rate of plants in a crop can be approximated by the product of three functions, each depending on one of the variables—plant weight, yield per unit area, and time. Assuming such an equation, several possible models of the relationship between total yield per unit area (or mean plant weight), the plant density and the length of the growth period are constructed by giving simple forms to the three functions. The connection between various yield-density models that have previously been suggested and the present work is indicated. With growth rate assumed to be independent of time, one or more of the derived equations fitted five sets of published experimental data reasonably well. However, only the most general of the equations considered gave consistently good fits to the five data sets. The fits to a sixth data set were much improved when growth rate depended directly on time, probably because of temperature changes during growth. Some slight but systematic differences between the models and experimental data are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One or more derived equations with time-independent growth rate fitted five experimental datasets reasonably well.

Taxon
plants in a cropt0
Outcome
fitted five sets of published experimental data reasonably welle0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“one or more of the derived equations fitted five sets of published experimental data reasonably well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“plants in a crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–35 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only the most general equation fitted all five datasets consistently well.

Taxon
plants in a cropt0
Outcome
consistently good fitse0
Comparator
the equations considerede0

Verbatim

e0

“only the most general of the equations considered gave consistently good fits to the five data sets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“plants in a crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–35 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allowing growth rate to depend on time improved fits to a sixth dataset.

Taxon
plants in a cropt0
Outcome
fits to a sixth data sete0
Direction
much improvede0
Comparator
growth rate depended directly on timee0

Verbatim

e0

“The fits to a sixth data set were much improved when growth rate depended directly on time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“plants in a crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–35 · show in text ↑