Paper · 1991 · HortScience

Comparison of Management Techniques for Broccoli Production Using a Systems Approach

S.B. Sterrett; C.W. Coale; C.P. Savage

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A systems approach that included production and economic aspects was used to assess broccoli potential as an alternate enterprise for eastern Virginia. Broccoli yield and head quality were improved with 96,400 plants/ha compared to 64,500 plants/ ha. While target populations for the early harvest were achieved with either transplants or direct seeding, plant establishment was significantly reduced for direct-seeding in the main-season harvest (85% vs. 95% for transplants). Increased cost of production with transplants resulted in reduced enterprise profit (before taxes) in the early harvest, while improved plant establishment and increased yield with transplants resulted in increased enterprise profit in the main-season harvest. The systems approach assessed market price risk through estimated revenue and yield risk, providing the information needed by growers for risk management decisions associated with broccoli as an alternate enterprise.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli yield and head quality improved with 96,400 plants/ha compared with 64,500 plants/ha.

Treatment
96,400 plants/hae0
Outcome
yield and head qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
64,500 plants/ hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli yield and head quality were improved with 96,400 plants/ha compared to 64,500 plants/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–249 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Target plant populations for the early harvest were achieved with either transplants or direct seeding.

Treatment
transplants or direct seedinge1
Outcome
target populations for the early harveste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli yield and head quality were improved with 96,400 plants/ha compared to 64,500 plants/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–249 · show in text ↑
e1

“While target populations for the early harvest were achieved with either transplants or direct seeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant establishment was significantly reduced for direct-seeding compared with transplants in the main-season harvest (85% vs. 95%).

Treatment
direct-seedinge2
Outcome
plant establishmente2
Direction
reducede2
Value
85% vs. 95%e2
Qualifier
main-season harveste2
Comparator
transplantse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli yield and head quality were improved with 96,400 plants/ha compared to 64,500 plants/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–249 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant establishment was significantly reduced for direct-seeding in the main-season harvest (85% vs. 95% for transplants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–476 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased cost of production with transplants reduced enterprise profit before taxes in the early harvest.

Treatment
transplantse3
Outcome
enterprise profit (before taxes)e3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
early harveste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli yield and head quality were improved with 96,400 plants/ha compared to 64,500 plants/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–249 · show in text ↑
e3

“Increased cost of production with transplants resulted in reduced enterprise profit (before taxes) in the early harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–597 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Improved plant establishment and increased yield with transplants increased enterprise profit in the main-season harvest.

Treatment
transplantse4
Outcome
enterprise profite4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
main-season harveste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broccoli yield and head quality were improved with 96,400 plants/ha compared to 64,500 plants/ ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–249 · show in text ↑
e4

“improved plant establishment and increased yield with transplants resulted in increased enterprise profit in the main-season harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–737 · show in text ↑

transplanting · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.