Paper · 1996 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B - Soil & Plant Science

Effects of Fertilizer Placement on Weeds in Weed Harrowed Spring Barley

Karsten Rasmussen; Jesper Rasmussen; Jens Petersen

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A series of six field experiments on spring barley were conducted to test the effect of fertilizer placement compared with broadcast application on weeds and crop yield. The experiments were carried out in 1993, 1994 and 1995, on two soil types, with three levels of fertilizing and without use of pesticides. Fertilizer placement reduced weed biomass by 55% and weed density by 10% and increased grain yield by 28%, on average. The strong effects on weeds were presumably due to a positive interaction between crop competition and weed control by weed harrowing. The biomass of almost all frequent weed species was reduced by fertilizer placement. The effect of fertilizer placement on weed density was weaker than on biomass. Fertilizer placement increased grain yield more on coarse sand than on sandy loam. All the effects were more pronounced in 1993 than in 1994 and 1995, most likely owing to dry weather in the spring of 1993.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement reduced weed biomass by 55% versus broadcast application.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Fertilizer placemente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
55%e0
Comparator
broadcast applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement reduced weed biomass by 55% and weed density by 10% and increased grain yield by 28%, on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with broadcast application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement reduced weed density by 10% versus broadcast application.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Fertilizer placemente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
broadcast applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement reduced weed biomass by 55% and weed density by 10% and increased grain yield by 28%, on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with broadcast application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement increased grain yield by 28% versus broadcast application.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Fertilizer placemente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28%e0
Comparator
broadcast applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement reduced weed biomass by 55% and weed density by 10% and increased grain yield by 28%, on average.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–437 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with broadcast application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop competition and weed harrowing presumably interacted to produce the strong weed effects.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
strong effects on weedse0
Qualifier
positive interaction between crop competition and weed control by weed harrowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strong effects on weeds were presumably due to a positive interaction between crop competition and weed control by weed harrowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement reduced biomass of almost all frequent weed species.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
fertilizer placemente0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
biomass of almost all frequent weed speciese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
broadcast applicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of almost all frequent weed species was reduced by fertilizer placement.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with broadcast application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement affected weed density less than weed biomass.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
effect of fertilizer placement on weed densitye0
Direction
weakere0
Comparator
biomasse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of fertilizer placement on weed density was weaker than on biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer placement increased grain yield more on coarse sand than sandy loam.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Fertilizer placemente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
coarse sande0
Comparator
sandy loame0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer placement increased grain yield more on coarse sand than on sandy loam.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effects were more pronounced in 1993 than in 1994 and 1995, possibly due to dry spring weather.

Taxon
Spring BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
All the effectse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
most likely owing to dry weather in the spring of 1993e0
Comparator
1994 and 1995e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the effects were more pronounced in 1993 than in 1994 and 1995, most likely owing to dry weather in the spring of 1993.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–71 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.