Paper · 2016 · Genetics and Molecular Research

Genetic diversity in cassava landraces grown on farms in Alta Floresta-MT, Brazil

A.V. Tiago; A.A.B. Rossi; P.V. Tiago; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Brazil is considered one of the domestication centers of cassava (Manihot esculenta), containing a large part of the biological diversity and traditional knowledge of the species. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the genetic diversity of cassava landraces grown by farmers in the north of Mato Grosso State, Brazil, using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) molecular markers. The study was carried out in the municipality of Alta Floresta, MT, on farms located in two rural areas. Seventeen cassava landraces were selected. The DNA was extracted and polymerase chain reaction amplifications were performed using 15 ISSR primers. Genetic similarity estimates were calculated using Jaccard's index and the generated matrix was used for clustering the genotypes by using UPGMA and Tocher's methods. The 15 ISSR primers amplified 120 fragments, revealing 61.67% polymorphism. The polymorphism information content ranged from 0.04 to 0.61, averaging 0.39. The most similar genotypes were AF5 and AF8, whereas the least similar were AF1 and AF16. The UPGMA clustering method formed five groups. Group I included twelve landraces, Group II contained two, and the other groups contained one landrace each. Tocher's method resulted in six groups: 12 landraces clustered in one group, and the other groups each contained one landrace. The ISSR markers proved efficient in revealing genetic diversity among the cassava landraces. The landraces grown by farmers in the two rural areas of Alta Floresta have a great variability and, thus, can be exploited in programs for breeding and preservation of the species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR primers amplified 120 fragments with 61.67% polymorphism.

Outcome
polymorphisme0
Value
61.67%e0
Qualifier
120 fragmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 15 ISSR primers amplified 120 fragments, revealing 61.67% polymorphism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymorphism information content ranged 0.04 to 0.61 and averaged 0.39.

Outcome
polymorphism information contente0
Value
0.04 to 0.61e0
Qualifier
averaging 0.39e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The polymorphism information content ranged from 0.04 to 0.61, averaging 0.39”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AF5 and AF8 were most similar.

Material
AF5 and AF8e0
Outcome
most similar genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most similar genotypes were AF5 and AF8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AF1 and AF16 were least similar.

Material
AF1 and AF16e0
Outcome
least similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the least similar were AF1 and AF16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPGMA formed five groups.

Outcome
five groupse0
Value
five groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The UPGMA clustering method formed five groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPGMA Group I contained twelve landraces.

Outcome
Group Ie0
Value
twelve landracese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Group I included twelve landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1135 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UPGMA Group II contained two landraces.

Outcome
Group IIe0
Value
twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Group II contained two”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other UPGMA groups contained one landrace each.

Outcome
other groupse0
Value
one landrace eache0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the other groups contained one landrace each”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tocher clustering formed six groups.

Outcome
six groupse0
Value
six groupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tocher's method resulted in six groups: 12 landraces clustered in one group, and the other groups each contained one landrace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tocher placed 12 landraces in one group.

Outcome
one groupe0
Value
12 landracese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“12 landraces clustered in one group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other Tocher groups each contained one landrace.

Outcome
other groupse0
Value
one landracee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the other groups each contained one landrace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ISSR markers revealed cassava landrace genetic diversity efficiently.

Outcome
genetic diversity among the cassava landracese0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ISSR markers proved efficient in revealing genetic diversity among the cassava landraces”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm landraces in two Alta Floresta rural areas showed great variability.

Outcome
great variabilitye0
Setting
Alta Florestae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The landraces grown by farmers in the two rural areas of Alta Floresta have a great variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1527 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest using this variability for breeding and preservation.

Outcome
breeding and preservation of the speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“can be exploited in programs for breeding and preservation of the species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–28 · show in text ↑