Paper · 2003 · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries)

Evaluation of Cultural Practices to Reduce the Incidence of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) in North Carolina Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

C. A. Hurt

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato Spotted Wilt virus (TSWV), a thrips-vectored virus, has recently become one of the most devastating pathogens of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in North Carolina. North Carolina peanut growers saw a dramatic increase in infestations of TSWV in 2000. Certain cultural techniques in Georgia have shown to lessen the amount of virus, and these were evaluated to determine their effect on TSWV incidence. The production systems are discrete between the runner-type peanuts grown in GA and the virginia-type peanuts in NC, thereby requiring that these practices be evaluated in the NC. Treatments included plant populations, varieties, twin and single row plantings, reduced tillage, planting dates, and in-furrow insecticides. During the growing seasons of 2001 and 2002, treatments compared were plant populations of 7, 13, and 17 plants per meter of row; varieties Gregory, NC V-11, and Perry; twin and single rows; conventional tillage and strip tillage; early and late planting dates; and phorate and aldicarb. Research plots were scouted for visual symptoms of TSWV monthly in 2001, and weekly in 2002. In 2001, symptomatic plants were tested for presence of the virus using the ImmunoStrip test system (Agdia, Elkhart, IN). High plant populations had less virus than lower plant populations, Gregory was infected with less virus than either NC V-11 or Perry, twin rows had a lower amount of virus compared to single rows, preliminarily strip tillage has had less virus than conventional tillage, and peanut treated with in-furrow phorate had less incidence of virus than those treated in-furrow with aldicarb.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher peanut plant populations had less virus than lower populations.

Treatment
High plant populationse0
Interactor
Tomato Spotted Wilt VirusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaet0pathogen
Outcome
viruse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
lower plant populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High plant populations had less virus than lower plant populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) in North Carolina Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gregory had less virus infection than NC V-11 or Perry.

Material
Gregorye0
Interactor
Tomato Spotted Wilt VirusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaet0pathogen
Outcome
viruse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
NC V-11 or Perrye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gregory was infected with less virus than either NC V-11 or Perry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) in North Carolina Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twin rows had less virus than single rows.

Treatment
twin rowse0
Interactor
Tomato Spotted Wilt VirusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaet0pathogen
Outcome
amount of viruse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
single rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“twin rows had a lower amount of virus compared to single rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) in North Carolina Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preliminary results indicated less virus under strip tillage than conventional tillage.

Treatment
strip tillagee0
Interactor
Tomato Spotted Wilt VirusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaet0pathogen
Outcome
viruse0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
preliminarilye0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preliminarily strip tillage has had less virus than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus (TSWV) in North Carolina Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut treated in furrow with phorate had less virus incidence than with aldicarb.

Treatment
in-furrow phoratee0
Outcome
incidence of viruse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
in-furrow with aldicarbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut treated with in-furrow phorate had less incidence of virus than those treated in-furrow with aldicarb”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1612 · show in text ↑

phorate · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tillage · Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.