Paper · 2002

Effect of Time of Planting Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Relative to Maize (Zea mays L.) on Growth and Yield of Cowpea

E. Adipala; C.P. Occaya; D.S.O. Osiru

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Field investigations were carried out for three seasons in two locations of Uganda to examine yield benefits when cowpea and maize are planted under intensive farming conditions. Additive mixtures of cowpea were planted into maize thrice at 2 weekly intervals together with sole crops. Time of introducing cowpea into maize significantly affected both the growth and yield of cowpea. Simultaneous planting generally showed a yield advantage (LER> 1) of the cowpea/ maize intercropping systems irrespective of the cowpea varieties used, but LER declined when time of introducing cowpea into maize was delayed being as low as 0.76 when cowpea was planted four weeks after planting maize. The reduction in the growth and yield of cowpea was due to increased shading from the maize plants especially when cowpea was introduced at the fourth week. Therefore, to achieve yield benefit simultaneous planting of maize and cowpea recommended. Resume Influence du decalage du semis du niebe ( Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) par rapport au mais (Zea mays L.) sur la croissance et le rendement du niebe

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying the introduction of cowpea into maize to four weeks after maize planting lowered LER, to as low as 0.76, compared with simultaneous planting.

Treatment
time of introducing cowpea into maize was delayede1
Interactor
maizeZea mayse1other
Outcome
LERe1
Direction
declinede1
Value
0.76e1
Comparator
Simultaneous plantinge1
Setting
Ugandae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Simultaneous planting generally showed a yield advantage (LER> 1) of the cowpea/ maize intercropping systems irrespective of the cowpea varieties used, but LER declined when time of introducing cowpea into maize was delayed being as low as 0.76 when cowpea was planted four weeks after planting maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–692 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field investigations were carried out for three seasons in two locations of Uganda”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Time of introducing cowpea into maize significantly affected the growth and yield of cowpea.

Treatment
Time of introducing cowpea into maizee1
Outcome
growth and yield of cowpeae1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Time of introducing cowpea into maize significantly affected both the growth and yield of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–390 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in cowpea growth and yield when cowpea was introduced late was attributed to increased shading from the maize plants.

Treatment
increased shading from the maize plantse1
Interactor
maizeZea mayse1other
Outcome
reduction in the growth and yield of cowpeae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The reduction in the growth and yield of cowpea was due to increased shading from the maize plants especially when cowpea was introduced at the fourth week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–849 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous planting of maize and cowpea is recommended to achieve yield benefit.

Outcome
yield benefite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Therefore, to achieve yield benefit simultaneous planting of maize and cowpea recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous planting gave cowpea/maize intercrops a yield advantage with LER above 1.

Treatment
Simultaneous plantinge1
Interactor
maizeZea mayse1other
Outcome
yield advantagee1
Value
LER> 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · InteractorAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Simultaneous planting generally showed a yield advantage (LER> 1) of the cowpea/ maize intercropping systems irrespective of the cowpea varieties used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–542 · show in text ↑

Zea mays · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 18 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.