Paper · 2015 · Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering

An Evaluation of the SRI on Increasing Yield, Water Productivity and Profitability; Experiences from TN-IAMWARM Project

Ravichandran VK Vibhu Nayar

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The increasing dependence on groundwater for growing staple food crops like paddy causes lowering of water table and serious depletion of groundwater storage in many parts of India including Tamil Nadu, a southern Indian state. This study is based on field research conducted during the Kharif seasons in 2011-2013 in Villupuram district, Tamil Nadu, to evaluate the impact of TN-IAMWARM Project’s adoption of SRI on agronomic productivity and irrigation water use efficiency. The adoption of SRI method in paddy cultivation has resulted in increased by 20% in paddy yield and net income 44.50% over the conventional cultivation. This has been achieved with substantial reduction in irrigation water application (42.33%), labor input (17.46%) and seed cost (87.47%). The economic attractiveness of SRI cultivation is very high, giving farmers a strong incentive to accept water-saving techniques as a new norm for irrigated paddy production. Hence, the cultivation of Kharif paddy (which is a high water consuming crop) through SRI practices promises to be a significant alternative for not only increasing paddy productivity, but also for savings on irrigation water and energy costs in the resource-starved regions of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI adoption in paddy cultivation increased paddy yield by 20% over conventional cultivation.

Taxon
paddye0
Treatment
SRI methode0
Outcome
paddy yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
conventional cultivatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of SRI method in paddy cultivation has resulted in increased by 20% in paddy yield and net income 44.50% over the conventional cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI adoption increased net income by 44.50% over conventional cultivation.

Taxon
paddye0
Treatment
SRI methode0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44.50%e0
Comparator
conventional cultivatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The adoption of SRI method in paddy cultivation has resulted in increased by 20% in paddy yield and net income 44.50% over the conventional cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI paddy cultivation reduced irrigation water application by 42.33%.

Taxon
paddye1
Treatment
SRI methode1
Outcome
irrigation water applicatione2
Direction
reductione2
Value
42.33%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“SRI method in paddy cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–524 · show in text ↑
e2

“substantial reduction in irrigation water application (42.33%), labor input (17.46%) and seed cost (87.47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI paddy cultivation reduced labor input by 17.46%.

Taxon
paddye1
Treatment
SRI methode1
Outcome
labor inpute2
Direction
reductione2
Value
17.46%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“SRI method in paddy cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–524 · show in text ↑
e2

“substantial reduction in irrigation water application (42.33%), labor input (17.46%) and seed cost (87.47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI paddy cultivation reduced seed cost by 87.47%.

Taxon
paddye1
Treatment
SRI methode1
Outcome
seed coste2
Direction
reductione2
Value
87.47%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“SRI method in paddy cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–524 · show in text ↑
e2

“substantial reduction in irrigation water application (42.33%), labor input (17.46%) and seed cost (87.47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–765 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The economic attractiveness of SRI cultivation of paddy is very high.

Taxon
paddye1
Outcome
economic attractivenesse3
Value
very highe3

Verbatim

e1

“SRI method in paddy cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–524 · show in text ↑
e3

“The economic attractiveness of SRI cultivation is very high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–826 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that SRI practices in Kharif paddy promise to be a significant alternative for increasing paddy productivity and saving water and energy.

Taxon
Kharif paddye0
Outcome
significant alternativee0

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivation of Kharif paddy (which is a high water consuming crop) through SRI practices promises to be a significant alternative for not only increasing paddy productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1125 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.