Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2010, 2011 and 2012 at Agricultural Research Station, Gadhinglaj under rainfed condition in sub-montane zone of Maharashtra. The experiment consisting of eight treatments, viz. two pre-emergence and one post-emergence herbicides alone and in combination with one hoeing and one weeding with weed free and weedy check was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. The predominant weed flora observed in the experimental field was dicot weeds. The result revealed that pre-emergence application of pendimethalin + 1 hoeing + 1 hand weeding recorded minimum weed density, weed biomass and weed index as compared with all treatments. Gross and net returns were significantly higher with pendimethalin + 1 hoeing + 1 hand weeding which was at par with butachlor + 1 hoeing +1 hand weeding and superior over rest of treatments. Higher weed control efficiency and B: C ratio were recorded by the same treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence pendimethalin plus one hoeing and one hand weeding gave minimum weed density, weed biomass and weed index compared with all treatments in chilli.
Verbatim
t0“Integrated weed management in chilli under rainfed condition”
e0“The result revealed that pre-emergence application of pendimethalin + 1 hoeing + 1 hand weeding recorded minimum weed density, weed biomass and weed index as compared with all treatments”
e1“A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2010, 2011 and 2012 at Agricultural Research Station, Gadhinglaj under rainfed condition”
e2“The predominant weed flora observed in the experimental field was dicot weeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross and net returns were significantly higher with pendimethalin plus one hoeing and one hand weeding than with the rest of the treatments in chilli.
Verbatim
t0“Integrated weed management in chilli under rainfed condition”
e3“Gross and net returns were significantly higher with pendimethalin + 1 hoeing + 1 hand weeding which was at par with butachlor + 1 hoeing +1 hand weeding and superior over rest of treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Gross and net returns with butachlor plus one hoeing and one hand weeding were at par with pendimethalin plus one hoeing and one hand weeding in chilli.
Verbatim
t0“Integrated weed management in chilli under rainfed condition”
e3“Gross and net returns were significantly higher with pendimethalin + 1 hoeing + 1 hand weeding which was at par with butachlor + 1 hoeing +1 hand weeding and superior over rest of treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Weed control efficiency and B:C ratio were higher under the same best treatments in chilli.
- Taxon
- chillit0
- Treatment
- same treatmentse4
- Outcome
- weed control efficiency and B: C ratioe4
- Direction
- Highere4
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Integrated weed management in chilli under rainfed condition”
e4“Higher weed control efficiency and B: C ratio were recorded by the same treatments”
The same questions in other papers
pendimethalin · weed · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
pendimethalin · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →herbicide · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →herbicide · weed · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.