Paper · 2014 · SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma)

Genetic Variation Within and Between Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov), Biotypes Found in the United States

Payton, Tracey Lee

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov), is a pest on wheat and barley in the Western United States. Management is achieved primarily by resistant varieties. In 2003, the Russian wheat aphid caused damage to wheat with the Dn4 resistance gene in Southeastern Colorado. The damaging biotype was designated RWA-2 and the extant population RWA-1. Plant response experiments showed variation within RWA-2 clones based on chlorosis, plant height, and shoot dry weight to wheat with the Dn4 resistance gene. Phenotypic variation found within RWA-2 argues against the hypothesis that RWA-2 populations consist of a single, genetically identical clone. I conducted studies to observe variation between and within Russian wheat aphid biotypes using 12 clones of RWA-1 and RWA-2 biotype, and a single clone of: RWA-3; RWA-4; and RWA-5 biotypes, determined according to plant response to Dn genes. Using RAPD-PCR, three single band polymorphisms were detected distinguishing RWA-5 and clone 7 (RWA-2) after screening all Russian wheat aphids with 58 primers. I found no sequence variation within or between biotypes in a 436 bp fragment of the COI gene in the mtDNA. Seven microsatellite DNA markers were used to evaluate clonal diversity, but no variation was found. In addition, cuticular hydrocarbon analysis was performed on multiple aphids belonging to a single clone of RWA-1, RWA-2, RWA-3, RWA-4, and RWA-5. This method showed RWA-1 and RWA-2 had unique hydrocarbon mixtures, based on principal component analysis. Ultimately all five biotypes could be separated according to canonical variables. Using genotypic markers, Russian wheat aphid biotypes are homogenous, and consist of a single introduction into the United States. Using phenotypic markers, RWA-1 and RWA-2 are more distinctive of the five Russian wheat aphid biotypes. Lack of genotypic variation could have resulted from a founder effect upon introduction into North America, followed by bottlenecking of populations in the United States.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Russian wheat aphids damaged wheat carrying the Dn4 resistance gene in southeastern Colorado.

Interactor
Russian wheat aphidDiuraphis noxiae0pest
Gene
Dn4e0
Outcome
damage to wheate0
Setting
Southeastern Coloradoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diuraphis noxia
Diuraphis noxia · InteractorPeggy Greb · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Russian wheat aphid caused damage to wheat with the Dn4 resistance gene in Southeastern Colorado”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RWA-2 clones caused variable chlorosis, height and shoot dry weight responses in Dn4 wheat.

Interactor
RWA-2 clonese0pest
Gene
Dn4e0
Outcome
chlorosis, plant height, and shoot dry weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variation within RWA-2 clones based on chlorosis, plant height, and shoot dry weight to wheat with the Dn4 resistance gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–513 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that phenotypic variation contradicts a single identical RWA-2 clone.

Interactor
RWA-2e0pest
Outcome
Phenotypic variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phenotypic variation found within RWA-2 argues against the hypothesis that RWA-2 populations consist of a single, genetically identical clone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three RAPD band polymorphisms distinguished RWA-5 and RWA-2 clone 7.

Interactor
RWA-5e0pest
Outcome
three single band polymorphismse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three single band polymorphisms were detected distinguishing RWA-5 and clone 7 (RWA-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1002 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No COI sequence variation was found within or between aphid biotypes.

Interactor
Russian wheat aphidDiuraphis noxiae1pest
Gene
COI genee0
Outcome
no sequence variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diuraphis noxia
Diuraphis noxia · InteractorPeggy Greb · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no sequence variation within or between biotypes in a 436 bp fragment of the COI gene in the mtDNA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“pest on wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven microsatellite markers found no clonal variation in aphid biotypes.

Interactor
Russian wheat aphidDiuraphis noxiae1pest
Outcome
no variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diuraphis noxia
Diuraphis noxia · InteractorPeggy Greb · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven microsatellite DNA markers were used to evaluate clonal diversity, but no variation was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“pest on wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RWA-1 and RWA-2 had distinct cuticular hydrocarbon mixtures.

Interactor
RWA-1 and RWA-2e0pest
Outcome
unique hydrocarbon mixturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RWA-1 and RWA-2 had unique hydrocarbon mixtures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1483 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canonical variables separated all five aphid biotypes.

Interactor
Russian wheat aphidDiuraphis noxiae1pest
Outcome
all five biotypes could be separatede0
Value
five biotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diuraphis noxia
Diuraphis noxia · InteractorPeggy Greb · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all five biotypes could be separated according to canonical variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1604 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“pest on wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypic markers indicated homogeneous aphid biotypes and a single introduction into the United States.

Interactor
Russian wheat aphidDiuraphis noxiae0pest
Outcome
homogenous, and consist of a single introductione0
Setting
United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diuraphis noxia
Diuraphis noxia · InteractorPeggy Greb · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using genotypic markers, Russian wheat aphid biotypes are homogenous, and consist of a single introduction into the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1606–1735 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenotypic markers made RWA-1 and RWA-2 the most distinctive of five biotypes.

Interactor
Russian wheat aphidDiuraphis noxiae0pest
Outcome
more distinctivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diuraphis noxia
Diuraphis noxia · InteractorPeggy Greb · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using phenotypic markers, RWA-1 and RWA-2 are more distinctive of the five Russian wheat aphid biotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1840 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest founder effect and bottlenecks as possible explanations for absent genotypic variation.

Interactor
Russian wheat aphidDiuraphis noxiae1pest
Outcome
Lack of genotypic variatione0
Qualifier
a founder effect upon introduction into North America, followed by bottlenecking of populations in the United Statese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diuraphis noxia
Diuraphis noxia · InteractorPeggy Greb · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lack of genotypic variation could have resulted from a founder effect upon introduction into North America, followed by bottlenecking of populations in the United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–2011 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia (Kurdjumov)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
e2

“pest on wheat and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑