Paper · 1951 · Annals of Botany

Influence of the Numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the Subsequent Nodulation of the Legume Host Plant

S. N. BHADURI

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
20
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture. Nine weeks after inoculation plants supplied with from 88,700 to 887,000 bacteria per c.c. of culture solution bore significantly more nodules than those given from 89 to 887 per c.c. An inoculum of 44,350 per c.c. produced intermediate numbers of nodules. One week after inoculation, the percentage of curled and of infected root-hairs on the seedlings was roughly proportional to the logarithm of the bacterial numbers supplied, while the numbers of nodules produced at this stage already showed a significant difference between extreme doses of inoculum. Nine weeks after inoculation the final nodule numbers were related to the percentages of curled and of infected root-hairs after one week. The final nodule numbers are related to the growth of the root system since the final number of nodules per gramme of root is independent of the initial dose of inoculum, the effect of which was mainly to cause an increase in root growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants given 88,700 to 887,000 bacteria per c.c. formed significantly more nodules than those given 89 to 887 per c.c.

Taxon
Phaseolus radiatus var. aureaVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
from 88,700 to 887,000 bacteria per c.c. of culture solutione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulese1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
from 89 to 887 per c.c.e1
Setting
water culturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants supplied with from 88,700 to 887,000 bacteria per c.c. of culture solution bore significantly more nodules than those given from 89 to 887 per c.c.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An inoculum of 44,350 per c.c. produced intermediate numbers of nodules.

Taxon
Phaseolus radiatus var. aureaVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
An inoculum of 44,350 per c.c.e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
numbers of nodulese1
Direction
intermediatee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“An inoculum of 44,350 per c.c. produced intermediate numbers of nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–407 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One week after inoculation, the percentage of curled and infected root-hairs was roughly proportional to the log of the bacterial numbers supplied.

Taxon
Phaseolus radiatus var. aureaVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
bacterial numbers suppliede1
Outcome
percentage of curled and of infected root-hairse1
Direction
roughly proportionale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“One week after inoculation, the percentage of curled and of infected root-hairs on the seedlings was roughly proportional to the logarithm of the bacterial numbers supplied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–581 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One week after inoculation, nodule numbers already differed significantly between the extreme inoculum doses.

Taxon
Phaseolus radiatus var. aureaVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Outcome
numbers of nodulese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“the numbers of nodules produced at this stage already showed a significant difference between extreme doses of inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–708 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final nodule numbers were related to the percentages of curled and infected root-hairs after one week.

Taxon
Phaseolus radiatus var. aureaVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Organ / stage
root-hairse1
Outcome
final nodule numberse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“the final nodule numbers were related to the percentages of curled and of infected root-hairs after one week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–847 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final nodules per gramme of root were independent of the initial inoculum dose.

Taxon
Phaseolus radiatus var. aureaVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
initial dose of inoculume1
Outcome
final number of nodules per gramme of roote1
Direction
independente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“the final number of nodules per gramme of root is independent of the initial dose of inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inoculum dose mainly increased root growth.

Taxon
Phaseolus radiatus var. aureaVigna radiata var. radiatae0
Treatment
initial dose of inoculume1
Outcome
root growthe2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of numbers of Rhizobium supplied on the subsequent numbers of nodules formed was tested with Phaseolus radiatus var. aurea in water culture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–150 · show in text ↑
e1

“the final number of nodules per gramme of root is independent of the initial dose of inoculum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1018 · show in text ↑
e2

“the effect of which was mainly to cause an increase in root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1086 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Rhizobium · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 118 positive, 8 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.