Paper · 1988 · HortScience

Electrolyte Leakage and Seed Quality in a Shrunken-2 Maize Selected for Improved Field Emergence

W. F. Tracy; John A. Juvik

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Acceptance of shrunken-2 ( sh2 ) sweet corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids is limited by poor seed quality and seedling emergence, especially in cold soils. The conductivity of the electrolytes leached from imbibing seeds, a rapid measurement of seed quality, is highly correlated with field emergence among sweet corn hybrids. Our objective was to determine if conductivity is related to field emergence in a sh2 population that had undergone selection for improved field emergence for 10 cycles. The response of conductivity to indirect selection was linear, and the linear trend accounted for a large portion of the variation in conductivity ( r 2 = 0.70). Conductivity ranged from 82.0 dS·m –1 in cycle 0 to 35.3 dS·m –1 in cycle 8, with cycle 10 not differing from cycle 8. High conductivity indicates greater electrolyte leakage. At P ≤ 0.01, conductivity was negatively correlated with all seed performance ratings; field emergence ( r = –0.82), plant height ( r = –0.81), uniformity ( r = –0.92), and relative emergence ( r = –0.85).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity responded linearly to selection for improved field emergence, with the trend explaining r² = 0.70 of its variation.

Treatment
indirect selectione0
Outcome
conductivitye0
Direction
lineare0
Value
r 2 = 0.70e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The response of conductivity to indirect selection was linear, and the linear trend accounted for a large portion of the variation in conductivity ( r 2 = 0.70).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–660 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-leachate conductivity fell from 82.0 dS·m –1 at cycle 0 to 35.3 dS·m –1 at cycle 8.

Material
cycle 8e0
Outcome
Conductivitye0
Direction
ranged frome0
Value
35.3 dS·m –1e0
Qualifier
82.0 dS·m –1 in cycle 0e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Conductivity ranged from 82.0 dS·m –1 in cycle 0 to 35.3 dS·m –1 in cycle 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycle 10 conductivity did not differ from cycle 8 conductivity.

Outcome
cycle 10e0
Direction
not differinge0
Comparator
cycle 8e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“cycle 10 not differing from cycle 8.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–779 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher conductivity indicated greater electrolyte leakage.

Outcome
electrolyte leakagee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
High conductivitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“High conductivity indicates greater electrolyte leakage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–836 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity was negatively correlated with field emergence at r = –0.82.

Outcome
field emergencee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Value
r = –0.82e0
Comparator
conductivitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At P ≤ 0.01, conductivity was negatively correlated with all seed performance ratings; field emergence ( r = –0.82)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–952 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity was negatively correlated with plant height at r = –0.81.

Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Value
r = –0.81e0
Comparator
conductivitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At P ≤ 0.01, conductivity was negatively correlated with all seed performance ratings; field emergence ( r = –0.82), plant height ( r = –0.81)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity was negatively correlated with uniformity at r = –0.92.

Outcome
uniformitye0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Value
r = –0.92e0
Comparator
conductivitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At P ≤ 0.01, conductivity was negatively correlated with all seed performance ratings; field emergence ( r = –0.82), plant height ( r = –0.81), uniformity ( r = –0.92)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1004 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity was negatively correlated with relative emergence at r = –0.85.

Outcome
relative emergencee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Value
r = –0.85e0
Comparator
conductivitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“At P ≤ 0.01, conductivity was negatively correlated with all seed performance ratings; field emergence ( r = –0.82), plant height ( r = –0.81), uniformity ( r = –0.92), and relative emergence ( r = –0.85).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1042 · show in text ↑