Paper · 2016 · Bangladesh Agronomy Journal

Hybrid Maize and Chilli Intercropping in the Hilly Areas of Bandarban

M Ahmed; S Ishtiaque; MMR Sarker; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at farmers’ field of On-Farm Research Division (OFRD), Bandarban during Rabi season of 2014-15 to find out suitable combination of hybrid maize and chilli intercropping system to increase system productivity and economic return. The experimental design was Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design with six dispersed replications. The maize var. BARI Hybrid Maize-9 and chilli (local) were used in the experiment. Two intercropping combinations viz., Maize single row (100 cm x 25 cm) + 2 rows chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) and Maize single row (150 cm x 25 cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) were evaluated against their sole crops. The highest gross return (Tk. 435040 ha-1), net return (Tk. 366290 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (6.33) were recorded in maize single row (150 cm x 25cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) combination. Cob yield of hybrid maize and green fruit yield of Chilli were the highest in the respective sole crops. The results revealed that maize single row (150 cm x 25 cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) combination might be suitable and economically profitable for the hilly areas.Bangladesh Agron. J. 2016, 19(1): 45-48

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 cm maize and three-row chilli combination had the highest gross return of Tk. 435040 ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize single row (150 cm x 25cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm)e0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Tk. 435040 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross return (Tk. 435040 ha-1), net return (Tk. 366290 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (6.33) were recorded in maize single row (150 cm x 25cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 cm maize and three-row chilli combination had the highest net return of Tk. 366290 ha-1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize single row (150 cm x 25cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Tk. 366290 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross return (Tk. 435040 ha-1), net return (Tk. 366290 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (6.33) were recorded in maize single row (150 cm x 25cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 cm maize and three-row chilli combination had the highest benefit cost ratio of 6.33.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize single row (150 cm x 25cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm)e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross return (Tk. 435040 ha-1), net return (Tk. 366290 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (6.33) were recorded in maize single row (150 cm x 25cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) combination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid maize cob yield was highest in the sole crop.

Taxon
hybrid maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole cropse0
Outcome
Cob yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cob yield of hybrid maize and green fruit yield of Chilli were the highest in the respective sole crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli green fruit yield was highest in the sole crop.

Taxon
Chillie0
Treatment
sole cropse0
Outcome
green fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cob yield of hybrid maize and green fruit yield of Chilli were the highest in the respective sole crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–957 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 150 cm maize and three-row chilli combination may suit hilly areas economically.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize single row (150 cm x 25 cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm)e0
Outcome
suitable and economically profitablee0
Setting
hilly arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize single row (150 cm x 25 cm) + 3 rows Chilli (50 cm x 40 cm) combination might be suitable and economically profitable for the hilly areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1127 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.