Paper · 2015

Performance evaluation of a tractor mounted pneumatic planter for sorghum in dryland

Ranjeet Kumar; Sirisha Adamala; Yogesh Anand Rajwade; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Performance of a pneumatic planter was studied in both laboratory and actual field conditions using sorghum seeds in context to justify its use in dry land. Pneumatic planter consists of frame, aspirator blower, seed hopper, metering unit, multi-groove metering plate, vacuum retaining plate, furrow opener, pair of ground wheels with power transmission system. The multi groove metering plate having seed hole of diameter 3 mm and vacuum pressure of 2 kPa were used throughout the experiments for picking of single seed. Based on the results of laboratory tests the performance of the pneumatic planter was carried out in field. Data on performance parameters of the pneumatic planter was collected, analyzed and found that, average values of plant to plant spacing, miss index and multiple index, actual field capacity and field efficiency were found to be 101 mm, 2.07%, 3.8%, 0.773 ha/h and 79.7%, respectively

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planter achieved average plant spacing of 101 mm.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
plant to plant spacinge0
Value
101 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“average values of plant to plant spacing, miss index and multiple index, actual field capacity and field efficiency were found to be 101 mm, 2.07%, 3.8%, 0.773 ha/h and 79.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–914 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planter miss index was 2.07%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
miss indexe0
Value
2.07%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“miss index and multiple index, actual field capacity and field efficiency were found to be 101 mm, 2.07%, 3.8%, 0.773 ha/h and 79.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–914 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The planter multiple index was 3.8%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
multiple indexe0
Value
3.8%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“multiple index, actual field capacity and field efficiency were found to be 101 mm, 2.07%, 3.8%, 0.773 ha/h and 79.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–914 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actual field capacity was 0.773 ha/h.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
actual field capacitye0
Value
0.773 ha/he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“actual field capacity and field efficiency were found to be 101 mm, 2.07%, 3.8%, 0.773 ha/h and 79.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–914 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field efficiency was 79.7%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
field efficiencye0
Value
79.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–73 · show in text ↑
e0

“field efficiency were found to be 101 mm, 2.07%, 3.8%, 0.773 ha/h and 79.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–914 · show in text ↑