Paper · 2012 · EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Pollination of euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids in agroecosystems and forest fragments in southeast Mexico

Anne Damon; Fabiola Hernández-Ramírez; Laura Riggi; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To determine the reproductive status of the native orchids of the biodiversity “hotspot”, Biological Corridor Tacaná-Boquerón, in theregion of Soconusco, southeast Mexico, which are suffering the effects of habitat degradation, unsustainable exploitation and potentially,climate change, we analysed the species richness, abundance, habitat and abiotic preferences, pollinaria transport and relation to orchidpopulations, of male Euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidea: Euglossini) in agroecosystems and forest fragments within the region. Usingvolatile baits we trapped 2,480 bees, consisting of 14 species, during a total of 256 hours, of which 284 individuals (11.5%) had pollinariaof 18 orchid species adhered to their bodies. Three species of Eufriesia (E. caerulescens, E. mexicana, E. rugosa) and one species of Euglossa(E. villosa) were recorded for the first time. We report Eulaema meriana as the pollinator of the recently rediscovered Plectrophora alata.We did not detect habitat preferences for the species of Euglossini captured, and they were frequent, or even more frequent, in intensivecoffee plantations, as are many of the orchid species, which can be classified as a disturbed habitat. Bees tended to be more abundantwith increasing light intensity and decreasing humidity at each site. There was little indication of pollinator specificity and the position ofthe pollinaria of each orchid species on the bodies of the bees was also variable. We did not recover any pollinaria from various euglossinophylic,epiphytic orchid species present in the region and three bee species showed signs of population decline. However, our resultsindicate that many species of orchids with this pollination syndrome are receiving pollination service within an increasingly fragmentedand disturbed environment, suggesting that both the orchids and the bees are adapting to the changes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollinaria of 18 orchid species were carried by 11.5% of the trapped bees.

Taxon
orchid speciese1
Interactor
beesAnthophilae1pollinator
Outcome
had pollinariae1
Value
11.5%e1

Verbatim

e1

“Using volatile baits we trapped 2,480 bees, consisting of 14 species, during a total of 256 hours, of which 284 individuals (11.5%) had pollinaria of 18 orchid species adhered to their bodies”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 537–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three Eufriesia bee species were recorded for the first time in the orchid pollination system.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Interactor
EufriesiaEufrieseae2pollinator
Outcome
were recorded for the first timee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eufriesea
Eufriesea · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Insects Unlocked · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“Three species of Eufriesia (E. caerulescens, E. mexicana, E. rugosa) and one species of Euglossa(E. villosa) were recorded for the first time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–869 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eulaema meriana was the pollinator of Plectrophora alata.

Taxon
Plectrophora alataPlectrophora alatae3
Interactor
Eulaema merianaEulaema merianae3pollinator
Outcome
the pollinatore3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eulaema meriana
Eulaema meriana · InteractorM. C. Cavalcante, F. F. Oliveira, M. M. Maués, and B. M. Freitas · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“We report Eulaema meriana as the pollinator of the recently rediscovered Plectrophora alata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–962 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Euglossini bees were even more frequent in intensive coffee plantations.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Interactor
EuglossiniEuglossinie4pollinator
Outcome
frequente4
Direction
even more frequente4
Setting
intensive coffee plantationse4

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“We did not detect habitat preferences for the species of Euglossini captured, and they were frequent, or even more frequent, in intensive coffee plantations, as are many of the orchid species, which can be classified as a disturbed habitat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 963–1201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many orchid species were frequent in intensive coffee plantations, a habitat classed as disturbed.

Taxon
orchid speciese4
Outcome
frequente4
Qualifier
which can be classified as a disturbed habitate4
Setting
intensive coffee plantationse4

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“We did not detect habitat preferences for the species of Euglossini captured, and they were frequent, or even more frequent, in intensive coffee plantations, as are many of the orchid species, which can be classified as a disturbed habitat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 963–1201 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No habitat preferences were detected for Euglossini bees.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Interactor
EuglossiniEuglossinie4pollinator
Outcome
habitat preferencese4

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“We did not detect habitat preferences for the species of Euglossini captured, and they were frequent, or even more frequent, in intensive coffee plantations, as are many of the orchid species, which can be classified as a disturbed habitat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 963–1201 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bees tended to be more abundant with increasing light intensity.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Treatment
increasing light intensitye5
Interactor
BeesAnthophilae5pollinator
Outcome
more abundante5
Direction
more abundante5

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e5

“Bees tended to be more abundant with increasing light intensity and decreasing humidity at each site”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1203–1302 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bees tended to be more abundant with decreasing humidity.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Treatment
decreasing humiditye5
Interactor
BeesAnthophilae5pollinator
Outcome
more abundante5
Direction
more abundante5

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e5

“Bees tended to be more abundant with increasing light intensity and decreasing humidity at each site”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1203–1302 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was little indication of pollinator specificity.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Outcome
pollinator specificitye6

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was little indication of pollinator specificity and the position of the pollinaria of each orchid species on the bodies of the bees was also variable”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1304–1458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The position of pollinaria on bee bodies was variable across orchid species.

Taxon
each orchid speciese6
Interactor
beesAnthophilae6pollinator
Outcome
the position of the pollinariae6
Qualifier
was also variablee6

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was little indication of pollinator specificity and the position of the pollinaria of each orchid species on the bodies of the bees was also variable”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1304–1458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No pollinaria were recovered from various epiphytic orchid species in the region.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Outcome
recover any pollinariae7

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e7

“We did not recover any pollinaria from various euglossinophylic,epiphytic orchid species present in the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three bee species showed signs of population decline.

Taxon
euglossinophylic epiphytic orchidst0
Interactor
three bee speciese1pollinator
Outcome
signs of population declinee1

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“three bee species showed signs of population decline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1575–1627 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many orchid species with this pollination syndrome are receiving pollination service in a fragmented and disturbed environment.

Taxon
many species of orchidse2
Outcome
receiving pollination servicee2

Verbatim

t0

“euglossinophylic epiphytic orchids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“many species of orchids with this pollination syndrome are receiving pollination service”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1663–1751 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Orchids and bees are suggested to be adapting to the changes.

Taxon
orchidse1
Interactor
beesAnthophilae1pollinator
Outcome
adapting to the changese1

Verbatim

e1

“suggesting that both the orchids and the bees are adapting to the changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1885 · show in text ↑