Paper · 2016 · Journal of Ecology

Competition and facilitation determine dwarf mistletoe infection dynamics

Mónica E. Queijeiro‐Bolaños; Edgar J. González; Carlos Martorell; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary Interspecific interactions have a fundamental role in plant population dynamics, as they may set the conditions for species coexistence. Parasitic plants, like dwarf mistletoes, offer the opportunity to study competition for resources that are different from those consumed by most plants, allowing for a better understanding of the interaction. We explored how interspecific interactions between two dwarf mistletoe species ( A rceuthobium ), co‐infecting the same host species (even sharing the same individual tree of P inus hartwegii ) affect their infection dynamics at two different stages of population development (colonization of new hosts and subsequent growth), and if heterogeneity in resource availability (host density and size structure) affects these interactions. For that purpose, we integrated these processes into a spatially explicit model of density‐dependent population growth. We found that self‐regulation (density‐dependence) was strong for both species; however, the intensity and sign of interspecific interactions changed depending on host size and demographic process. Population growth in Arceuthobium globosum was reduced by competition, except for smaller hosts where A . globosum growth was facilitated by Arceuthobium vaginatum . A rceuthobium vaginatum was facilitated by A . globosum regardless of host size. Colonization of new hosts by A . globosum was enhanced by previous infection by the other species, showing intraguild facilitation. Demographic importance of interactions depended on stand structure: in homogeneous, low‐density forests, facilitation predominates, increasing the population sizes of both species, whereas the opposite occurs in heterogeneous and dense forests. Both species achieved stable coexistence, fulfilling the invasibility criterion because each mistletoe species can invade a forest that is already infected by the other species. Synthesis . Despite the fundamentally different mechanisms underlying the interactions between mistletoes compared with non‐parasitic plants, our results reveal that their behaviour at the population level is similar. Stabilizing mechanisms, like strong self‐limiting population growth, allow dwarf mistletoe coexistence. Interactions shift as populations develop, and they depend largely on environmental factors such as forest structure. Intraguild mutualism is shown as a relevant process for colonization of new spaces, highlighting the complexity of competitive/facilitative interactions between parasitic plants, a formerly unexplored subject. Interactions can only be fully understood when integrating all their components at the population level. Analysing these interactions may contribute to the understanding of plant–plant interactions in general, and convey interesting implications for forest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Both mistletoe species showed strong density dependence.

Taxon
dwarf mistletoet0
Outcome
self‐regulation (density‐dependence)e0
Direction
stronge0

Verbatim

e0

“self‐regulation (density‐dependence) was strong for both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–987 · show in text ↑
t0

“dwarf mistletoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Competition reduced A. globosum population growth.

Taxon
Arceuthobium globosumArceuthobium globosume0
Outcome
Population growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
competitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arceuthobium globosum
Arceuthobium globosum · TaxonBernabe Colohua · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Population growth in Arceuthobium globosum was reduced by competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1176 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A. vaginatum facilitated A. globosum growth on smaller hosts.

Taxon
A . globosumArceuthobium globosume0
Interactor
Arceuthobium vaginatumArceuthobium vaginatume0parasite
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
facilitatede0
Qualifier
smaller hostse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arceuthobium globosum
Arceuthobium globosum · TaxonBernabe Colohua · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Arceuthobium vaginatum
Arceuthobium vaginatum · InteractorPaul Harrison · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“smaller hosts where A . globosum growth was facilitated by Arceuthobium vaginatum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1270 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A. globosum facilitated A. vaginatum regardless of host size.

Taxon
A rceuthobium vaginatume0
Interactor
A . globosumArceuthobium globosume0parasite
Outcome
A rceuthobium vaginatum was facilitatede0
Direction
facilitatede0
Qualifier
regardless of host sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arceuthobium globosum
Arceuthobium globosum · InteractorBernabe Colohua · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A rceuthobium vaginatum was facilitated by A . globosum regardless of host size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1352 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Previous infection by the other mistletoe enhanced A. globosum colonization.

Taxon
A . globosumArceuthobium globosume0
Treatment
previous infection by the other speciese0
Outcome
Colonization of new hostse0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arceuthobium globosum
Arceuthobium globosum · TaxonBernabe Colohua · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colonization of new hosts by A . globosum was enhanced by previous infection by the other species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1451 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Facilitation increased both species’ populations in homogeneous, low-density forests.

Taxon
dwarf mistletoet0
Outcome
population sizese0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
homogeneous, low‐density forestse0

Verbatim

e0

“in homogeneous, low‐density forests, facilitation predominates, increasing the population sizes of both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1665 · show in text ↑
t0

“dwarf mistletoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The opposite interaction pattern occurred in heterogeneous and dense forests.

Taxon
dwarf mistletoet0
Outcome
the opposite occurse0
Setting
heterogeneous and dense forestse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the opposite occurs in heterogeneous and dense forests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1729 · show in text ↑
t0

“dwarf mistletoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Both species achieved stable coexistence.

Taxon
dwarf mistletoet0
Outcome
stable coexistencee0

Verbatim

e0

“Both species achieved stable coexistence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1731–1771 · show in text ↑
t0

“dwarf mistletoe”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–54 · show in text ↑