Abstract
Summary Interspecific interactions have a fundamental role in plant population dynamics, as they may set the conditions for species coexistence. Parasitic plants, like dwarf mistletoes, offer the opportunity to study competition for resources that are different from those consumed by most plants, allowing for a better understanding of the interaction. We explored how interspecific interactions between two dwarf mistletoe species ( A rceuthobium ), co‐infecting the same host species (even sharing the same individual tree of P inus hartwegii ) affect their infection dynamics at two different stages of population development (colonization of new hosts and subsequent growth), and if heterogeneity in resource availability (host density and size structure) affects these interactions. For that purpose, we integrated these processes into a spatially explicit model of density‐dependent population growth. We found that self‐regulation (density‐dependence) was strong for both species; however, the intensity and sign of interspecific interactions changed depending on host size and demographic process. Population growth in Arceuthobium globosum was reduced by competition, except for smaller hosts where A . globosum growth was facilitated by Arceuthobium vaginatum . A rceuthobium vaginatum was facilitated by A . globosum regardless of host size. Colonization of new hosts by A . globosum was enhanced by previous infection by the other species, showing intraguild facilitation. Demographic importance of interactions depended on stand structure: in homogeneous, low‐density forests, facilitation predominates, increasing the population sizes of both species, whereas the opposite occurs in heterogeneous and dense forests. Both species achieved stable coexistence, fulfilling the invasibility criterion because each mistletoe species can invade a forest that is already infected by the other species. Synthesis . Despite the fundamentally different mechanisms underlying the interactions between mistletoes compared with non‐parasitic plants, our results reveal that their behaviour at the population level is similar. Stabilizing mechanisms, like strong self‐limiting population growth, allow dwarf mistletoe coexistence. Interactions shift as populations develop, and they depend largely on environmental factors such as forest structure. Intraguild mutualism is shown as a relevant process for colonization of new spaces, highlighting the complexity of competitive/facilitative interactions between parasitic plants, a formerly unexplored subject. Interactions can only be fully understood when integrating all their components at the population level. Analysing these interactions may contribute to the understanding of plant–plant interactions in general, and convey interesting implications for forest management.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Both mistletoe species showed strong density dependence.
Verbatim
e0“self‐regulation (density‐dependence) was strong for both species”
t0“dwarf mistletoe”
Claim · model-written summary
Competition reduced A. globosum population growth.
- Taxon
- Arceuthobium globosum
Arceuthobium globosume0 - Outcome
- Population growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- competitione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Population growth in Arceuthobium globosum was reduced by competition”
Claim · model-written summary
A. vaginatum facilitated A. globosum growth on smaller hosts.
- Taxon
- A . globosum
Arceuthobium globosume0 - Interactor
- Arceuthobium vaginatum
Arceuthobium vaginatume0parasite - Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- facilitatede0
- Qualifier
- smaller hostse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“smaller hosts where A . globosum growth was facilitated by Arceuthobium vaginatum”
Claim · model-written summary
A. globosum facilitated A. vaginatum regardless of host size.
- Taxon
- A rceuthobium vaginatume0
- Interactor
- A . globosum
Arceuthobium globosume0parasite - Outcome
- A rceuthobium vaginatum was facilitatede0
- Direction
- facilitatede0
- Qualifier
- regardless of host sizee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“A rceuthobium vaginatum was facilitated by A . globosum regardless of host size”
Claim · model-written summary
Previous infection by the other mistletoe enhanced A. globosum colonization.
- Taxon
- A . globosum
Arceuthobium globosume0 - Treatment
- previous infection by the other speciese0
- Outcome
- Colonization of new hostse0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Colonization of new hosts by A . globosum was enhanced by previous infection by the other species”
Claim · model-written summary
Facilitation increased both species’ populations in homogeneous, low-density forests.
Verbatim
e0“in homogeneous, low‐density forests, facilitation predominates, increasing the population sizes of both species”
t0“dwarf mistletoe”
Claim · model-written summary
The opposite interaction pattern occurred in heterogeneous and dense forests.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“the opposite occurs in heterogeneous and dense forests”
t0“dwarf mistletoe”
Claim · model-written summary
Both species achieved stable coexistence.
Verbatim
e0“Both species achieved stable coexistence”
t0“dwarf mistletoe”