Paper · 2016 · Plant Production Science

Growth and yield responses of upland NERICAs to variable water management under field conditions

Mayumi Kikuta; Daigo Makihara; Naoya Arita; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the possible causes for inconsistent performances of upland New Rice for Africa (NERICA) varieties in uplands and lowlands, while identifying important determinants in grain yield under deficient soil moisture. We compared the growth and yield of NERICA 1 and NERICA 5 to those of Yumenohatamochi, a Japanese upland variety, and Hinohikari, a Japanese lowland variety, subjected to different water management regimes (continually flooded, supplementary irrigation, and non-irrigation). Under conditions of deficient soil moisture, panicle number per square meter, spikelet number per panicle, and 1000-grain weight of NERICAs decreased, whereas the panicle number of the Japanese varieties experienced little change. In contrast, the grain filling ratio was unaffected by water management, irrespective of variety. The primary source of yield reduction under low soil water conditions was a decrease in spikelet number per panicle, and water stress intensity was the primary factor for the degree of this reduction. Variation in the abortion of secondary rachis-branches caused differences between NERICAs in their spikelet number response to soil moisture deficiency. The inconsistency in NERICA performance across uplands vs. lowlands can be partially attributed to variation in yield response to low soil water conditions. Moreover, water stress intensity and the presence of a water gradient along the vertical soil profile may combine to affect the fluctuation in NERICA performance under upland conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficient soil moisture decreased NERICA panicle number, spikelet number and 1000-grain weight.

Taxon
NERICAst0
Treatment
deficient soil moisturee0
Outcome
panicle number per square meter, spikelet number per panicle, and 1000-grain weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under conditions of deficient soil moisture, panicle number per square meter, spikelet number per panicle, and 1000-grain weight of NERICAs decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–667 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland NERICAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Japanese varieties showed little change in panicle number under deficient moisture.

Material
Japanese varietiese0
Treatment
deficient soil moisturee0
Outcome
panicle numbere0
Direction
little changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under conditions of deficient soil moisture, panicle number per square meter, spikelet number per panicle, and 1000-grain weight of NERICAs decreased, whereas the panicle number of the Japanese varieties experienced little change.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–748 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yumenohatamochi, a Japanese upland variety, and Hinohikari, a Japanese lowland variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“upland New Rice for Africa (NERICA) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water management did not affect grain filling ratio regardless of variety.

Treatment
water managemente0
Outcome
grain filling ratioe0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
irrespective of varietye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain filling ratio was unaffected by water management, irrespective of variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–846 · show in text ↑
e1

“upland New Rice for Africa (NERICA) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–130 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Decreased spikelet number per panicle was the primary source of yield reduction under low soil water.

Taxon
NERICAst0
Treatment
low soil water conditionse0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Qualifier
a decrease in spikelet number per paniclee0

Verbatim

e0

“The primary source of yield reduction under low soil water conditions was a decrease in spikelet number per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland NERICAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress intensity was the primary determinant of spikelet-number reduction.

Taxon
NERICAst0
Treatment
water stress intensitye0
Outcome
spikelet number per paniclee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The primary source of yield reduction under low soil water conditions was a decrease in spikelet number per panicle, and water stress intensity was the primary factor for the degree of this reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“upland NERICAs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–44 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary rachis-branch abortion variation caused NERICA differences in spikelet response to moisture deficiency.

Taxon
NERICAse0
Outcome
spikelet number responsee0
Qualifier
Variation in the abortion of secondary rachis-branchese0

Verbatim

e0

“Variation in the abortion of secondary rachis-branches caused differences between NERICAs in their spikelet number response to soil moisture deficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1200 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variable yield response to low soil water partially explains inconsistent upland versus lowland performance.

Taxon
NERICAe0
Outcome
inconsistency in NERICA performancee0
Qualifier
variation in yield response to low soil water conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The inconsistency in NERICA performance across uplands vs. lowlands can be partially attributed to variation in yield response to low soil water conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1357 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress intensity and vertical soil water gradients may jointly affect upland NERICA performance fluctuations.

Taxon
NERICAe0
Outcome
fluctuation in NERICA performancee0
Qualifier
water stress intensity and the presence of a water gradient along the vertical soil profilee0

Verbatim

e0

“water stress intensity and the presence of a water gradient along the vertical soil profile may combine to affect the fluctuation in NERICA performance under upland conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1544 · show in text ↑

soil water · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 21 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.