Paper · 2016 · Acta Horticulturae

Responses of four shallot (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum Group) cultivars to moler disease (Fusarium spp.) after bulb treatment

A. Wibowo; E. Kaeni; T. Toekidjo; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Moler disease of shallot caused by Fusarium spp. is the most frequent disease found in Indonesia especially in the wet land. The disease is soil borne and since bulb seed is used as planting materials the disease is also seed borne. This research objective is to study the effectiveness of various bulb treatment including hot water treatment, biofertilizer, and fungicide on four shallot cultivars against Fusarium spp. infection. This research was done in the greenhouse with Complete Random Design (CRD) of two factors. There are four cultivars 'Tiron', 'Crok', 'Trisula', and 'Kuning', and eight treatments of bulb shallot with three repetitions. The treatments are bulb submerging in aquadest as positive control with Fusarium sp. inoculation by soil dreching of conidial suspension and negative control without Fusarium sp. inoculation, bulb submerging in hot water at 45 and 50°C, each for 15 and 30 min., bulb submerging in fungicide, and the last is submerging in diluted biofertilizer. 'Kuning' cultivar is the most susceptible followed by 'Crok', and 'Trisula', respectively. 'Tiron' cultivar, on the other hand was found without any infection on all treatments including that of without any bulb treatment. The effective heat treatment was found on the treatment of 45°C for 30 min. and the heat treatments of 45-50°C did not affect the seed sprouting and the growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kuning was the most susceptible shallot cultivar, followed by Crok and Trisula.

Material
'Kuning'e0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
susceptiblee0
Direction
most susceptiblee0
Comparator
'Crok', and 'Trisula'e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Kuning' cultivar is the most susceptible followed by 'Crok', and 'Trisula', respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum Group) cultivars to moler disease (Fusarium spp.) after bulb treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiron had no infection across all treatments, including no bulb treatment.

Material
'Tiron'e0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
without any infectione0
Qualifier
on all treatments including that of without any bulb treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“'Tiron' cultivar, on the other hand was found without any infection on all treatments including that of without any bulb treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum Group) cultivars to moler disease (Fusarium spp.) after bulb treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb heat treatment at 45°C for 30 minutes was effective against moler disease.

Treatment
45°C for 30 min.e0
Interactor
Fusarium spp.Fusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
effective heat treatmente0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective heat treatment was found on the treatment of 45°C for 30 min.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum Group) cultivars to moler disease (Fusarium spp.) after bulb treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat treatments at 45–50°C did not affect shallot sprouting or growth.

Treatment
heat treatments of 45-50°Ce0
Outcome
seed sprouting and the growthe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the heat treatments of 45-50°C did not affect the seed sprouting and the growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“shallot (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum Group)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–59 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.