Abstract
Intercropping of short duration crop with sugarcane is a remunerative practices under different irrigation levels. This study was initiated with the objective of determining and evaluating different irrigation depth and intervals under intercropping of sugarcane with soybean on yield and water use efficiency. The experiment was carried out with three depth of (75, 100 and 125% ET) in combination with three irrigation interval of (7, 12 and 16 days) with three replication of randomized complete block design (RCBD). The result revealed that it was noted highly significant difference among treatment on stalk count, tillering, stalk weight and stalk height with a highest value of 116 × 103 ha-1, 126.44 × 103 ha-1, 1.89 kg stalk-1 and 2.87 cm, respectively at 100% ET Irrigation depth with interval of 7 days, 75%ET irrigation depth with 12 days interval, 75%ET with 7 days and 75% ET irrigation depth with 12 days irrigation interval. However no significant difference was observed among treatments on cane yield, sugar quality parameters and sugar yield. It was observed highly significant difference among treatments on biomass, plant population, pod per plant and seed per pod of soybean while no significant difference was noted on weight of 1000 seeds and soybean yield. Based on the result obtained it was concluded that intercropping is good practices in realizing and achieving a sustainable advantage of farming at different irrigation levels. It is recommended to use the treatment received 75% ET of irrigation depth and 12 days of irrigation interval especially when shortage of water supply is occurred. It has a net benefit cost ratio of with the advantage of 86.47% and 83.34% over the control. For further recommendation of the treatment it is better to verify T4 (75% ET with 12 days), T6 (125% ET with 12 days) and T10 (Conventional) irrigation depth and irrigation interval.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Stalk count was highest at 100% ET irrigation depth with a 7-day interval.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 100% ET Irrigation depth with interval of 7 dayse1
- Outcome
- stalk counte2
- Direction
- highest valuee1
- Value
- 116 × 103 ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“with a highest value of 116 × 103 ha-1, 126.44 × 103 ha-1, 1.89 kg stalk-1 and 2.87 cm, respectively at 100% ET Irrigation depth with interval of 7 days, 75%ET irrigation depth with 12 days interval, 75%ET with 7 days and 75% ET irrigation depth with 12 days irrigation interval”
e2“highly significant difference among treatment on stalk count, tillering, stalk weight and stalk height”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Tillering was highest at 75% ET irrigation depth with a 12-day interval.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 75%ET irrigation depth with 12 days intervale1
- Outcome
- tilleringe2
- Direction
- highest valuee1
- Value
- 126.44 × 103 ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“with a highest value of 116 × 103 ha-1, 126.44 × 103 ha-1, 1.89 kg stalk-1 and 2.87 cm, respectively at 100% ET Irrigation depth with interval of 7 days, 75%ET irrigation depth with 12 days interval, 75%ET with 7 days and 75% ET irrigation depth with 12 days irrigation interval”
e2“highly significant difference among treatment on stalk count, tillering, stalk weight and stalk height”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Stalk weight was highest at 75% ET irrigation depth with a 7-day interval.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 75%ET with 7 dayse1
- Outcome
- stalk weighte2
- Direction
- highest valuee1
- Value
- 1.89 kg stalk-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“with a highest value of 116 × 103 ha-1, 126.44 × 103 ha-1, 1.89 kg stalk-1 and 2.87 cm, respectively at 100% ET Irrigation depth with interval of 7 days, 75%ET irrigation depth with 12 days interval, 75%ET with 7 days and 75% ET irrigation depth with 12 days irrigation interval”
e2“highly significant difference among treatment on stalk count, tillering, stalk weight and stalk height”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Stalk height was highest at 75% ET irrigation depth with a 12-day interval.
- Taxon
- Sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- 75% ET irrigation depth with 12 days irrigation intervale1
- Outcome
- stalk heighte2
- Direction
- highest valuee1
- Value
- 2.87 cme1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“with a highest value of 116 × 103 ha-1, 126.44 × 103 ha-1, 1.89 kg stalk-1 and 2.87 cm, respectively at 100% ET Irrigation depth with interval of 7 days, 75%ET irrigation depth with 12 days interval, 75%ET with 7 days and 75% ET irrigation depth with 12 days irrigation interval”
e2“highly significant difference among treatment on stalk count, tillering, stalk weight and stalk height”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Cane yield, sugar quality parameters and sugar yield did not differ significantly among irrigation treatments.
Verbatim
e3“no significant difference was observed among treatments on cane yield, sugar quality parameters and sugar yield”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean biomass and plant population differed highly significantly among irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe4 - Outcome
- biomass, plant populatione4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“highly significant difference among treatments on biomass, plant population, pod per plant and seed per pod of soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean pod per plant and seed per pod differed highly significantly among irrigation treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe4
- Outcome
- pod per plant and seed per pode4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“highly significant difference among treatments on biomass, plant population, pod per plant and seed per pod of soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean 1000-seed weight and yield did not differ significantly among treatments.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe5
- Outcome
- weight of 1000 seeds and soybean yielde5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“while no significant difference was noted on weight of 1000 seeds and soybean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping net benefit cost ratio was 86.47% and 83.34% above the control.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e6“It has a net benefit cost ratio of with the advantage of 86.47% and 83.34% over the control”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping is a good practice for a sustainable advantage of farming at different irrigation levels.
Verbatim
e7“intercropping is good practices in realizing and achieving a sustainable advantage of farming at different irrigation levels”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment of 75% ET irrigation depth with 12 days interval is recommended when water is short.
Verbatim
e7“It is recommended to use the treatment received 75% ET of irrigation depth and 12 days of irrigation interval especially when shortage of water supply is occurred”
t0“Crop Water Requirements of Sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.