Paper · 2012 · Crop Research

Growth, yield and quality of fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) as affected by split application of fertilizer and cutting management

A. Alipatra; C. K. Kundu; P. Bandopadhyay; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of split application of fertilizer on the performance of forage oat crop (var. JHO-822) under single and double cut management practice was studied at Central Research Farm, Gayeshpur under Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya on sandy loam alluvial soil. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with 18 treatment combinations replicated thrice. The results revealed that split application of fertilizers had a significant influence on growth of oat with respect to plant height, LAI and leaf : stem ratio. Green forage yield, dry matter yield and also quality aspects of oat such as crude protein yield and crude fibre yield were significantly improved by split application of fertilizer under both single and double cut management. But under double cut management, total green and dry forage yield as well as total crude protein and crude fibre yield were significantly higher than single cut management practice. Application of nitrogen (90 kg/ha) in three splits (½ dose as basal+¼ dose at 20 DAS+¼ dose at 40 DAS) and potassium (60 kg/ha) in two splits (½ as basal+½ at 20 DAS) under double cutting management was the best proposition for obtaining highest green and dry fodder as well as crude protein yield and crude fibre yield of fodder oats in new alluvial soils of West Bengal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split fertilizer application significantly affected oat height, leaf area index and leaf to stem ratio.

Treatment
split application of fertilizerse0
Outcome
plant height, LAI and leaf : stem ratioe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“split application of fertilizers had a significant influence on growth of oat with respect to plant height, LAI and leaf : stem ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split fertilizer application significantly improved green forage and dry matter yields under both cutting regimes.

Treatment
split application of fertilizere0
Outcome
Green forage yield, dry matter yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under both single and double cut managemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green forage yield, dry matter yield and also quality aspects of oat such as crude protein yield and crude fibre yield were significantly improved by split application of fertilizer under both single and double cut management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Split fertilizer application significantly improved crude protein and crude fibre yields under both cutting regimes.

Treatment
split application of fertilizere0
Outcome
crude protein yield and crude fibre yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under both single and double cut managemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green forage yield, dry matter yield and also quality aspects of oat such as crude protein yield and crude fibre yield were significantly improved by split application of fertilizer under both single and double cut management.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting gave significantly higher total green and dry forage yield than single cutting.

Treatment
double cut managemente0
Outcome
total green and dry forage yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
single cut management practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under double cut management, total green and dry forage yield as well as total crude protein and crude fibre yield were significantly higher than single cut management practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Double cutting gave significantly higher total crude protein and crude fibre yield than single cutting.

Treatment
double cut managemente0
Outcome
total crude protein and crude fibre yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
single cut management practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under double cut management, total green and dry forage yield as well as total crude protein and crude fibre yield were significantly higher than single cut management practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–39 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The stated nitrogen and potassium split schedule with double cutting was the best yield proposition for fodder oats in West Bengal alluvial soil.

Taxon
fodder oatse0
Treatment
nitrogen (90 kg/ha) in three splits (½ dose as basal+¼ dose at 20 DAS+¼ dose at 40 DAS) and potassium (60 kg/ha) in two splits (½ as basal+½ at 20 DAS)e0
Outcome
highest green and dry fodder as well as crude protein yield and crude fibre yielde0
Setting
West Bengale0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nitrogen (90 kg/ha) in three splits (½ dose as basal+¼ dose at 20 DAS+¼ dose at 40 DAS) and potassium (60 kg/ha) in two splits (½ as basal+½ at 20 DAS) under double cutting management was the best proposition for obtaining highest green and dry fodder as well as crude protein yield and crude fibre yield of fodder oats in new alluvial soils of West Bengal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1324 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.