Paper · 1993 · HortScience

EVALUATION OF CLOMAZONE FOR USE IN CUCURBITS

Wayne C. Porter

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Clomazone was evaluated for reemergence weed control in summer squash, watermelon, cantaloupe, cucumber, and pumpkin. Clomazone was applied preplant incorporated or surface-applied after planting. All crops exhibited varying degrees of chlorosis in the cotyledonary stage and first one to three true leaves. Cucurbit tolerance to clomazone was pumpkin = squash > cucumber > watermelon > cantaloupe. Method of application did not affect crop vigor. Some pumpkin cultivars were more tolerant than others. Clomazone controlled Brachiaria platyphylla and Portulaca oleracea with both methods of application. Surface application provided better control of Amaranthus hybridus and A. spinosa. Mollugo verticillata was not controlled. Preplant incorporated application of clomazone tended to reduce the yield of watermelon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cucurbit crops showed chlorosis after clomazone application.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Organ / stage
cotyledonary stage and first one to three true leavese0
Treatment
Clomazonee1
Outcome
chlorosise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“All crops exhibited varying degrees of chlorosis in the cotyledonary stage and first one to three true leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–307 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clomazone was applied preplant incorporated or surface-applied after planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucurbit tolerance ranked pumpkin and squash above cucumber, watermelon, and cantaloupe.

Taxon
Cucurbite0
Outcome
tolerance to clomazonee0
Direction
pumpkin = squash > cucumber > watermelon > cantaloupee0

Verbatim

e0

“Cucurbit tolerance to clomazone was pumpkin = squash > cucumber > watermelon > cantaloupe.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–398 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application method did not affect crop vigor.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Treatment
Method of applicatione0
Outcome
crop vigore0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Method of application did not affect crop vigor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pumpkin cultivars differed in clomazone tolerance.

Taxon
pumpkine0
Outcome
tolerante0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
otherse0

Verbatim

e0

“Some pumpkin cultivars were more tolerant than others.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clomazone controlled Brachiaria platyphylla with both application methods.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Treatment
Clomazonee0
Interactor
Brachiaria platyphyllaUrochloa platyphyllae0weed
Outcome
controlled Brachiaria platyphyllae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Urochloa platyphylla
Urochloa platyphylla · InteractorAndrés González · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clomazone controlled Brachiaria platyphylla and Portulaca oleracea with both methods of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clomazone controlled Portulaca oleracea with both application methods.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Treatment
Clomazonee0
Interactor
Portulaca oleraceaPortulaca oleraceae0weed
Outcome
Portulaca oleraceae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Portulaca oleracea
Portulaca oleracea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clomazone controlled Brachiaria platyphylla and Portulaca oleracea with both methods of application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface application improved Amaranthus hybridus control.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Treatment
Surface applicatione0
Interactor
Amaranthus hybridusAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Outcome
control of Amaranthus hybriduse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus hybridus
Amaranthus hybridus · InteractorUser:MarkusHagenlocher · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Surface application provided better control of Amaranthus hybridus and A. spinosa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface application improved A. spinosa control.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Treatment
Surface applicatione0
Interactor
A. spinosae0weed
Outcome
A. spinosae0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Surface application provided better control of Amaranthus hybridus and A. spinosa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mollugo verticillata was not controlled.

Taxon
CUCURBITSt0
Interactor
Mollugo verticillataMollugo verticillatae0weed
Outcome
Mollugo verticillata was not controllede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mollugo verticillata
Mollugo verticillata · InteractorEric in SF · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mollugo verticillata was not controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“CUCURBITS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant incorporated clomazone tended to reduce watermelon yield.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment
Preplant incorporated application of clomazonee0
Outcome
yield of watermelone0
Direction
reducee0
Qualifier
tendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preplant incorporated application of clomazone tended to reduce the yield of watermelon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–816 · show in text ↑

clomazone · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.