Paper · 2005 · Acta Horticulturae

CLOSED GREENHOUSE: A STARTING POINT FOR SUSTAINABLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN HORTICULTURE

J.J.G Opdam; G.G. Schoonderbeek; E.M.B. Heller; et al.

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
96
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Between 1998 and 2003, the company Ecofys from Utrecht developed and tested a new concept of an integrated climate and energy system that permits permanently closing the ventilation windows of a greenhouse. The technical concept consists of a combined heat and power unit, heat pump, underground (aquifer) seasonal energy storage as well as daytime storage, air treatment units, and air distribution ducts. Active air circulation is one of the key elements for controlling the climate (T, RH, CO2) at crop level. This paper discusses the technical aspects and the results of a trial using a fully closed 1400 m demonstration greenhouse for tomato production. Results showed: 1) reduction in primary energy (fossil fuel) use of 20 and 35% respectively for an “island” closed greenhouse and a closed-conventional combination greenhouse, 2) increase in tomato yield of 20%, 3) an 80% reduction in chemical crop protection, and 4) a 50% reduction in use of irrigation water. The energy efficiency was improved by 50%. Finally, some preliminary environmental data will be shown for the first 14,000 m of closed greenhouse installed at a commercial greenhouse operation. The concept of a fully closed greenhouse will be discussed in relation to sustainable greenhouse production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An island closed greenhouse reduced primary energy use by 20%.

Treatment
“island” closed greenhousee0
Outcome
primary energy (fossil fuel) usee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
20e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction in primary energy (fossil fuel) use of 20 and 35% respectively for an “island” closed greenhouse and a closed-conventional combination greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in tomato yield of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“HORTICULTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A closed-conventional combination greenhouse reduced primary energy use by 35%.

Treatment
closed-conventional combination greenhousee0
Outcome
primary energy (fossil fuel) usee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
35%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduction in primary energy (fossil fuel) use of 20 and 35% respectively for an “island” closed greenhouse and a closed-conventional combination greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in tomato yield of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“HORTICULTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closed greenhouse production increased tomato yield by 20%.

Treatment
closed greenhousee2
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in tomato yield of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–878 · show in text ↑
e2

“reduction in primary energy (fossil fuel) use of 20 and 35% respectively for an “island” closed greenhouse and a closed-conventional combination greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“a fully closed 1400 m demonstration greenhouse for tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closed greenhouse production reduced chemical crop protection use by 80%.

Outcome
chemical crop protectione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an 80% reduction in chemical crop protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in tomato yield of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“HORTICULTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closed greenhouse production reduced irrigation water use by 50%.

Outcome
use of irrigation watere0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 50% reduction in use of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in tomato yield of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“HORTICULTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy efficiency improved by 50%.

Outcome
energy efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
50%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The energy efficiency was improved by 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in tomato yield of 20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“HORTICULTURE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–84 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 78 positive, 25 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.