Paper · 2016 · Tropical Agriculture

Statistical model for evolving a croplogging technique in banana 25

R. Venugopalan; K.S. Shamasundaran

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Efforts were made to develop robust statistical models to evolve a crop-logging technique for identifying best yield indicators of banana (cv. Robusta), across its different growth stages. Optimum values of the identified variables were also worked out based on various biometrical characters of 200 plants observed at a farmer's field. Statistical models developed and validated showed that at 70 days after planting (DAP), number of leaves and plant girth [Coefficient of Determination (R2) 88%] with optimum values as 8 leaves and 15.07 cm were the best yield indicators. While at 126 DAP, plant girth and number of leaves (R2 = 89%) with optimum values as 34.5 cm and 12 leaves and at 185 DAP, plant height and leaf length (R2 = 92%) with optimum values as 138.9 cm and 127.3 cm were significant crop-logging parameters. Further, results showed that at 250 DAP, plant height and plant girth (R2 = 90%) with optimum values as 159.21 cm and 67.8 cm and at 315 DAP, leaf breadth and leaf length (R2 = 81%) with optimum values as 67.2 cm and 164.1 cm were the significant yield predictors. Finally, during harvest stage, i.e., at 375 DAP, number of fingers per bunch, and number of hands per bunch (R2 = 99%) with optimum values as 26 fingers hand-1 and 13 hands bunch-1 were the best indicators of crop yield. Identified models were also made robust by removing the effect of multicollinearity among biometrical characters. Before making a final decision about the model adequacy, randomness assumption about the error term was statistically tested.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70 DAP, leaf number and plant girth predicted yield with R2 of 88%.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of leaves and plant girthe0
Value
88%e0
Qualifier
70 days after planting (DAP)e0

Verbatim

e0

“at 70 days after planting (DAP), number of leaves and plant girth [Coefficient of Determination (R2) 88%] with optimum values as 8 leaves and 15.07 cm were the best yield indicators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70 DAP, optimum leaf number was 8 leaves.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
8 leavese0
Qualifier
70 days after planting (DAP)e0

Verbatim

e0

“at 70 days after planting (DAP), number of leaves and plant girth [Coefficient of Determination (R2) 88%] with optimum values as 8 leaves and 15.07 cm were the best yield indicators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70 DAP, optimum girth was 15.07 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant girthe0
Value
15.07 cme0
Qualifier
70 days after planting (DAP)e0

Verbatim

e0

“at 70 days after planting (DAP), number of leaves and plant girth [Coefficient of Determination (R2) 88%] with optimum values as 8 leaves and 15.07 cm were the best yield indicators.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 126 DAP, girth and leaf number were significant yield indicators with R2 of 89%.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant girth and number of leavese0
Value
89%e0
Qualifier
126 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 126 DAP, plant girth and number of leaves (R2 = 89%) with optimum values as 34.5 cm and 12 leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 126 DAP, optimum plant girth was 34.5 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant girthe0
Value
34.5 cme0
Qualifier
126 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 126 DAP, plant girth and number of leaves (R2 = 89%) with optimum values as 34.5 cm and 12 leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 126 DAP, optimum leaf number was 12 leaves.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Value
12 leavese0
Qualifier
126 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 126 DAP, plant girth and number of leaves (R2 = 89%) with optimum values as 34.5 cm and 12 leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 185 DAP, height and leaf length predicted yield with R2 of 92%.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant height and leaf lengthe0
Value
92%e0
Qualifier
185 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 185 DAP, plant height and leaf length (R2 = 92%) with optimum values as 138.9 cm and 127.3 cm were significant crop-logging parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 185 DAP, optimum height was 138.9 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
138.9 cme0
Qualifier
185 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 185 DAP, plant height and leaf length (R2 = 92%) with optimum values as 138.9 cm and 127.3 cm were significant crop-logging parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 185 DAP, optimum leaf length was 127.3 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Value
127.3 cme0
Qualifier
185 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 185 DAP, plant height and leaf length (R2 = 92%) with optimum values as 138.9 cm and 127.3 cm were significant crop-logging parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 DAP, height and girth predicted yield with R2 of 90%.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant height and plant girthe0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
250 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 250 DAP, plant height and plant girth (R2 = 90%) with optimum values as 159.21 cm and 67.8 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 DAP, optimum height was 159.21 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
159.21 cme0
Qualifier
250 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 250 DAP, plant height and plant girth (R2 = 90%) with optimum values as 159.21 cm and 67.8 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 250 DAP, optimum girth was 67.8 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
plant girthe0
Value
67.8 cme0
Qualifier
250 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 250 DAP, plant height and plant girth (R2 = 90%) with optimum values as 159.21 cm and 67.8 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 315 DAP, leaf breadth and length predicted yield with R2 of 81%.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
leaf breadth and leaf lengthe0
Value
81%e0
Qualifier
315 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 315 DAP, leaf breadth and leaf length (R2 = 81%) with optimum values as 67.2 cm and 164.1 cm were the significant yield predictors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 315 DAP, optimum leaf breadth was 67.2 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
leaf breadthe0
Value
67.2 cme0
Qualifier
315 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 315 DAP, leaf breadth and leaf length (R2 = 81%) with optimum values as 67.2 cm and 164.1 cm were the significant yield predictors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 315 DAP, optimum leaf length was 164.1 cm.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Value
164.1 cme0
Qualifier
315 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 315 DAP, leaf breadth and leaf length (R2 = 81%) with optimum values as 67.2 cm and 164.1 cm were the significant yield predictors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, fingers and hands per bunch predicted yield with R2 of 99%.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of fingers per bunch, and number of hands per bunche0
Value
99%e0
Qualifier
375 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 375 DAP, number of fingers per bunch, and number of hands per bunch (R2 = 99%) with optimum values as 26 fingers hand-1 and 13 hands bunch-1 were the best indicators of crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, optimum finger number was 26 fingers hand-1.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of fingers per bunche0
Value
26 fingers hand-1e0
Qualifier
375 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 375 DAP, number of fingers per bunch, and number of hands per bunch (R2 = 99%) with optimum values as 26 fingers hand-1 and 13 hands bunch-1 were the best indicators of crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At harvest, optimum hand number was 13 hands bunch-1.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
number of hands per bunche0
Value
13 hands bunch-1e0
Qualifier
375 DAPe0

Verbatim

e0

“at 375 DAP, number of fingers per bunch, and number of hands per bunch (R2 = 99%) with optimum values as 26 fingers hand-1 and 13 hands bunch-1 were the best indicators of crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–64 · show in text ↑