Abstract
Since density is considered as one of the most important numerical indices to explain quantitative values of a plant community by affecting on many aspects and activity of ecosystem, on the other hand, awareness about plants distribution pattern in environment is an essential preparation for measurement and study of vegetative cover, therefore, in this research determination of density and distribution pattern of vegetative cover were carried out in two forest and steppe areas of Isfahan Industrial University using plots and distance methods. The results explained that, distribution pattern of vegetative cover of forest area had a uniform distribution so that, Point quarter, Ordered distance and T-square methods had a smaller standard error respectively. In the steppe area with bulk distribution pattern, standard error was less in Point quarter, Ordered distance, T-square and plot respectively. On the other hand in forest area, density resulted from Ordered distance, T-square, plot and Point quarter methods were respectively close to the real density. While in the steppe area, density resulted from Point quarter, Ordered distance, T-square and plot methods were respectively close to the real density
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Forest vegetation had a uniform distribution.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“distribution pattern of vegetative cover of forest area had a uniform distribution”
Claim · model-written summary
Steppe vegetation had a bulk distribution pattern.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“In the steppe area with bulk distribution pattern”
Claim · model-written summary
In forest vegetation, Point quarter, Ordered distance and T-square methods ranked in ascending standard error.
- Outcome
- standard errore0
- Direction
- smallere0
- Comparator
- Point quarter, Ordered distance and T-square methodse0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Point quarter, Ordered distance and T-square methods had a smaller standard error respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In steppe vegetation, Point quarter, Ordered distance, T-square and plot methods ranked in ascending standard error.
- Outcome
- standard errore0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- Point quarter, Ordered distance, T-square and plote0
- Setting
- steppe areae0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“In the steppe area with bulk distribution pattern, standard error was less in Point quarter, Ordered distance, T-square and plot respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In forest vegetation, Ordered distance, T-square, plot and Point quarter ranked by closeness to real density.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“in forest area, density resulted from Ordered distance, T-square, plot and Point quarter methods were respectively close to the real density”
Claim · model-written summary
In steppe vegetation, Point quarter, Ordered distance, T-square and plot ranked by closeness to real density.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“in the steppe area, density resulted from Point quarter, Ordered distance, T-square and plot methods were respectively close to the real density”