Paper · 2013 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Effects Of Entomopathogenic Nematodes On Suppressing Hairy Rose Beetle, Tropinota Squalida Scop. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Population In Cauliflower Field In Egypt

A. S. Abdel-Razek; M. M. M. Abd-Elgawad

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The potential of entomopathogenic nematodes in suppressing T. squalida population on cauliflower from transplanting to harvest was evaluated. Significant reductions in plant infestation percentage and population density (/m2) were recorded throughout the plantation seasons, 2011 and 2012 before and after spraying the plants. The percent reduction in numbers/m2 was the highest in March for the treatments with Heterorhabditis indica Behera and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Giza during the plantation season 2011, while at the plantation season 2012, the reduction in population density was the highest in January for Heterorhabditis Indica Behera and in February for H . bacteriophora Giza treatments. In a comparison test with conventional insecticides Hostathion and Lannate, there were no significant differences in control measures resulting from treatments with H. indica Behera, H. bacteriophora Giza and Lannate. At the plantation season is 2012. Also, the treatments reduced the economic threshold of T. squalida on cauliflower in this experiment as compared with before and after spraying with both the two entomopathogenic nematodes at both seasons 2011 and 2012. This means an increase in the marketability of heads harvested as a consequence of monthly treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode spraying significantly reduced cauliflower infestation and beetle population density in 2011 and 2012.

Treatment
spraying the plantse0
Outcome
plant infestation percentage and population density (/m2)e0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
beforee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Significant reductions in plant infestation percentage and population density (/m2) were recorded throughout the plantation seasons, 2011 and 2012 before and after spraying the plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterorhabditis indica Behera had its highest beetle density reduction in March 2011.

Treatment
Heterorhabditis indica Beherae0
Outcome
percent reduction in numbers/m2e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
Marche0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The percent reduction in numbers/m2 was the highest in March for the treatments with Heterorhabditis indica Behera and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Giza during the plantation season 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Giza had its highest beetle density reduction in March 2011.

Treatment
Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Gizae0
Outcome
percent reduction in numbers/m2e0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
Marche0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The percent reduction in numbers/m2 was the highest in March for the treatments with Heterorhabditis indica Behera and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Giza during the plantation season 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012 the largest population reduction occurred in January with Heterorhabditis Indica Behera.

Treatment
Heterorhabditis Indica Beherae0
Outcome
reduction in population densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
Januarye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction in population density was the highest in January for Heterorhabditis Indica Behera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012 the largest population reduction occurred in February with H. bacteriophora Giza.

Outcome
H . bacteriophora Giza treatmentse0
Qualifier
Februarye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“in February for H . bacteriophora Giza treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control measures did not differ significantly between the two nematodes and Lannate.

Treatment
H. indica Beherae0
Outcome
control measurese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
Lannatee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“there were no significant differences in control measures resulting from treatments with H. indica Behera, H. bacteriophora Giza and Lannate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments reduced the economic threshold of T. squalida on cauliflower.

Treatment
spraying with both the two entomopathogenic nematodese0
Outcome
economic threshold of T. squalidae0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
beforee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. botrytis
Brassica oleracea var. botrytis · TaxonSusan Slater · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatments reduced the economic threshold of T. squalida on cauliflower in this experiment as compared with before and after spraying with both the two entomopathogenic nematodes at both seasons 2011 and 2012.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monthly treatments were interpreted to increase cauliflower head marketability.

Treatment
monthly treatmentse0
Outcome
marketability of heads harvestede0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This means an increase in the marketability of heads harvested as a consequence of monthly treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1279 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · organism · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · organism · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.