Paper · 2017 · Phytopathology

Host Resistance and Chemical Control for Management of Sclerotinia Stem Rot of Soybean in Ohio

Jaqueline Huzar-Novakowiski; Pierce A. Paul; Anne E. Dorrance

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Recent outbreaks of Sclerotinia stem rot (SSR) of soybean in Ohio, along with new fungicides and cultivars with resistance to this disease, have led to a renewed interest in studies to update disease management guidelines. The effect of host resistance (in moderately resistant [MR] and moderately susceptible [MS] cultivars) and chemical control on SSR and yield was evaluated in 12 environments from 2014 to 2016. The chemical treatments evaluated were an untreated check, four fungicides (boscalid, picoxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, and thiophanate-methyl), and one herbicide (lactofen) applied at soybean growth stage R1 (early flowering) alone or at R1 followed by a second application at R2 (full flowering). SSR developed in 6 of 12 environments, with mean disease incidence in the untreated check of 2.5 to 41%. The three environments with high levels of SSR (disease incidence in the untreated check >20%) were used for further statistical analysis. There were significant effects (P < 0.05) of soybean cultivar and chemical treatment on SSR levels. Significantly lower levels of SSR were observed in MR cultivars. Both boscalid and lactofen reduced SSR but did not increase yield. Pyraclostrobin increased SSR compared with the untreated check in the three environments with high levels of disease. In the six fields where SSR did not develop, chemical treatment did not increase yield, nor was the yield from the MR cultivar significantly different from the MS cultivar. For Ohio, MR cultivars alone were effective for management of SSR in soybean fields where this disease has historically occurred.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSR developed in six of twelve soybean environments, with untreated incidence from 2.5 to 41%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
SSRe0
Value
2.5 to 41%e0
Setting
12 environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SSR developed in 6 of 12 environments, with mean disease incidence in the untreated check of 2.5 to 41%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MR soybean cultivars had significantly lower SSR levels.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
MR cultivarse0
Outcome
levels of SSRe0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly lower levels of SSR were observed in MR cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

boscalid reduced soybean SSR.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
boscalide0
Outcome
SSRe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both boscalid and lactofen reduced SSR but did not increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

boscalid did not increase soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
boscalide0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both boscalid and lactofen reduced SSR but did not increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

lactofen reduced soybean SSR.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
lactofene0
Outcome
SSRe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both boscalid and lactofen reduced SSR but did not increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

lactofen did not increase soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
lactofene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both boscalid and lactofen reduced SSR but did not increase yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1187 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyraclostrobin increased soybean SSR versus untreated check in high disease environments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Pyraclostrobine0
Outcome
SSRe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
three environments with high levels of diseasee0
Comparator
untreated checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pyraclostrobin increased SSR compared with the untreated check in the three environments with high levels of disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical treatment did not increase soybean yield in six fields without SSR.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
chemical treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not increasee0
Qualifier
six fields where SSR did not develope0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the six fields where SSR did not develop, chemical treatment did not increase yield, nor was the yield from the MR cultivar significantly different from the MS cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of MR and MS soybean cultivars was not significantly different in fields without SSR.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
MR cultivare0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
significantly differente0
Comparator
MS cultivare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the six fields where SSR did not develop, chemical treatment did not increase yield, nor was the yield from the MR cultivar significantly different from the MS cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For Ohio soybean fields with historical SSR, MR cultivars alone were effective for disease management.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
MR cultivarse0
Outcome
MR cultivars alone were effective for management of SSRe0
Setting
Ohioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For Ohio, MR cultivars alone were effective for management of SSR in soybean fields where this disease has historically occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑

pyraclostrobin · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.