Paper · 2017 · Scientific Reports

Unravelling mycorrhiza-induced wheat susceptibility to the English grain aphid Sitobion avenae

Amma L. Simon; Peter A. D. Wellham; Gudbjorg I. Aradottir; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts that can increase or decrease aphid growth rates and reproduction, but the reason by which this happens is unknown. To investigate the underlying mechanisms of this interaction, we examined the effect of AM fungi on the English Grain aphid (Sitobion avenae) development, reproduction, attraction, settlement and feeding behaviour on two naturally susceptible varieties Triticum aestivum (L.) variety Solstice and T. monococcum MDR037, and two naturally resistant lines, T. monococcum MDR045 and MDR049. Mycorrhizal colonisation increased the attractiveness of T. aestivum var. Solstice to aphids, but there was no effect on aphid development on this variety. Using the Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG) technique, we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on T. monococcum MDR037 and MDR045, colonisation also increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on these varieties. Mycorrhizas increased vascular bundle size, demonstrating that these fungi can influence plant anatomy. We discuss if and how this could be related to an enhanced success rate in phloem feeding in two varieties. Overall, we present and discuss how mycorrhizal fungi can affect the feeding behaviour of S. avenae in wheat, inducing susceptibility in a resistant variety.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation increased the attractiveness of wheat variety Solstice to aphids.

Taxon
T. aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Solsticee0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal colonisatione0
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Second interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie1symbiont
Outcome
attractivenesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal colonisation increased the attractiveness of T. aestivum var. Solstice to aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation had no effect on aphid development on wheat variety Solstice.

Taxon
T. aestivumTriticum aestivume0
Material
Solsticee0
Treatment
Mycorrhizal colonisatione0
Interactor
aphide1pest
Outcome
aphid developmente1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycorrhizal colonisation increased the attractiveness of T. aestivum var. Solstice to aphids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“there was no effect on aphid development on this variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on Triticum monococcum line MDR037.

Taxon
T. monococcumTriticum monococcume0
Material
MDR037e0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonisatione0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Second interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie1symbiont
Outcome
aphid phloem feedinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum monococcum
Triticum monococcum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on T. monococcum MDR037 and MDR045, colonisation also increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on these varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on Triticum monococcum line MDR045.

Taxon
T. monococcumTriticum monococcume0
Material
MDR045e0
Treatment
mycorrhizal colonisatione0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Second interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie1symbiont
Outcome
aphid phloem feedinge0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum monococcum
Triticum monococcum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on T. monococcum MDR037 and MDR045, colonisation also increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on these varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on Triticum monococcum line MDR037.

Taxon
T. monococcumTriticum monococcume0
Material
MDR037e0
Treatment
colonisatione0
Interactor
S. avenaeSitobion avenaee0pest
Second interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie1symbiont
Outcome
growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenaee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum monococcum
Triticum monococcum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitobion avenae
Sitobion avenae · InteractorBildoj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on T. monococcum MDR037 and MDR045, colonisation also increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on these varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal colonisation increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on Triticum monococcum line MDR045.

Taxon
T. monococcumTriticum monococcume0
Material
MDR045e0
Treatment
colonisatione0
Interactor
S. avenaeSitobion avenaee0pest
Second interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie1symbiont
Outcome
growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenaee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum monococcum
Triticum monococcum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sitobion avenae
Sitobion avenae · InteractorBildoj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we found that mycorrhizal colonisation increased aphid phloem feeding on T. monococcum MDR037 and MDR045, colonisation also increased growth rate and reproductive success of S. avenae on these varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–970 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizas increased vascular bundle size in wheat.

Treatment
Mycorrhizase0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungie1symbiont
Outcome
vascular bundle sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“mycorrhiza-induced wheat susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mycorrhizas increased vascular bundle size, demonstrating that these fungi can influence plant anatomy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are root symbionts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–52 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.