Abstract
A field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra) during kharif season of 2012- 13 to find out the energy efficient cropping system having higher system productivity and more resource use efficient. The experiment was laid out in factorial randomized block design with four replication consisting of two tillage practices (conventional tillage and minimum tillage) and four cropping systems[Sole pigeonpea, Pigeonpea + soybean (1:2), Pigeonpea + Sunnhemp (1:2) and Pigeonpea+ soybean (1:5)]. Highest plant height and root length was found in sole pigeonpea compared with intercropping system. Higher pigeonpea grain yield(18.5q/ ha)was recorded under sole pigeonpea,being on par with pigeonpea +sunhemp (1:2) whereas,under intercropping system higher yield was recorded in pigeonpea + soybean (1:5).Flower to pod conversion percentage (42.3%), PEY (26.2q/ha), system productivity (14.6kg/ha), rainfall use efficiency (4.43kg/ha/ mm), output energy (1, 37,108 MJ/ha) and energy use efficiency (0.41) were found maximum under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) system. Output energy (1, 33,976 MJ/ha), output energy ratio (23.88), energy use efficiency (0.36) and energy balance (1, 28,313 MJ/ha) were found maximum in minimum tillage as compared to conventional tillage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pigeonpea had the highest plant height and root length compared with intercropping in Akola.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane1 - Treatment
- sole pigeonpeae1
- Outcome
- plant height and root lengthe1
- Direction
- Higheste1
- Comparator
- intercropping systeme1
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e1“Highest plant height and root length was found in sole pigeonpea compared with intercropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Sole pigeonpea gave higher grain yield (18.5 q/ha), on par with pigeonpea + sunnhemp (1:2).
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
- Treatment
- sole pigeonpeae2
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- Highere2
- Value
- 18.5q/ hae2
- Qualifier
- on par with pigeonpea +sunhemp (1:2)e3
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e2“Higher pigeonpea grain yield(18.5q/ ha)was recorded under sole pigeonpea”
e3“being on par with pigeonpea +sunhemp (1:2)”
Claim · model-written summary
Under intercropping, pigeonpea + soybean (1:5) gave higher yield.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane4
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + soybean (1:5)e4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- highere4
- Comparator
- intercropping systeme4
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e4“under intercropping system higher yield was recorded in pigeonpea + soybean (1:5)”
Claim · model-written summary
Flower to pod conversion was maximum (42.3%) under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2).
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane5
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) systeme5
- Outcome
- Flower to pod conversion percentagee5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 42.3%e5
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e5“Flower to pod conversion percentage (42.3%), PEY (26.2q/ha), system productivity (14.6kg/ha), rainfall use efficiency (4.43kg/ha/ mm), output energy (1, 37,108 MJ/ha) and energy use efficiency (0.41) were found maximum under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) system”
Claim · model-written summary
PEY was maximum (26.2 q/ha) under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2).
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane5
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) systeme5
- Outcome
- PEYe5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 26.2q/hae5
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e5“Flower to pod conversion percentage (42.3%), PEY (26.2q/ha), system productivity (14.6kg/ha), rainfall use efficiency (4.43kg/ha/ mm), output energy (1, 37,108 MJ/ha) and energy use efficiency (0.41) were found maximum under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) system”
Claim · model-written summary
System productivity was maximum (14.6 kg/ha) under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2).
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane5
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) systeme5
- Outcome
- system productivitye5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 14.6kg/hae5
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e5“Flower to pod conversion percentage (42.3%), PEY (26.2q/ha), system productivity (14.6kg/ha), rainfall use efficiency (4.43kg/ha/ mm), output energy (1, 37,108 MJ/ha) and energy use efficiency (0.41) were found maximum under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) system”
Claim · model-written summary
Rainfall use efficiency was maximum (4.43 kg/ha/mm) under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2).
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane5
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) systeme5
- Outcome
- rainfall use efficiencye5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 4.43kg/ha/ mme5
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e5“Flower to pod conversion percentage (42.3%), PEY (26.2q/ha), system productivity (14.6kg/ha), rainfall use efficiency (4.43kg/ha/ mm), output energy (1, 37,108 MJ/ha) and energy use efficiency (0.41) were found maximum under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) system”
Claim · model-written summary
Output energy was maximum (1,37,108 MJ/ha) under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2).
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane5
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) systeme5
- Outcome
- output energye5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 1, 37,108 MJ/hae5
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e5“Flower to pod conversion percentage (42.3%), PEY (26.2q/ha), system productivity (14.6kg/ha), rainfall use efficiency (4.43kg/ha/ mm), output energy (1, 37,108 MJ/ha) and energy use efficiency (0.41) were found maximum under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) system”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy use efficiency was maximum (0.41) under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2).
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane5
- Treatment
- pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) systeme5
- Outcome
- energy use efficiencye5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Value
- 0.41e5
- Setting
- Akola (Maharashtra)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“field study was conducted at Agronomy farm, Department of Agronomy, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola (Maharashtra)”
e5“Flower to pod conversion percentage (42.3%), PEY (26.2q/ha), system productivity (14.6kg/ha), rainfall use efficiency (4.43kg/ha/ mm), output energy (1, 37,108 MJ/ha) and energy use efficiency (0.41) were found maximum under pigeonpea + soybean (1:2) system”
Claim · model-written summary
Output energy was maximum (1,33,976 MJ/ha) under minimum tillage compared with conventional tillage.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea based intercropping system”
e6“Output energy (1, 33,976 MJ/ha), output energy ratio (23.88), energy use efficiency (0.36) and energy balance (1, 28,313 MJ/ha) were found maximum in minimum tillage as compared to conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Output energy ratio was maximum (23.88) under minimum tillage compared with conventional tillage.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea based intercropping system”
e6“Output energy (1, 33,976 MJ/ha), output energy ratio (23.88), energy use efficiency (0.36) and energy balance (1, 28,313 MJ/ha) were found maximum in minimum tillage as compared to conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy use efficiency was maximum (0.36) under minimum tillage compared with conventional tillage.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea based intercropping system”
e6“Output energy (1, 33,976 MJ/ha), output energy ratio (23.88), energy use efficiency (0.36) and energy balance (1, 28,313 MJ/ha) were found maximum in minimum tillage as compared to conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Energy balance was maximum (1,28,313 MJ/ha) under minimum tillage compared with conventional tillage.
Verbatim
t0“pigeonpea based intercropping system”
e6“Output energy (1, 33,976 MJ/ha), output energy ratio (23.88), energy use efficiency (0.36) and energy balance (1, 28,313 MJ/ha) were found maximum in minimum tillage as compared to conventional tillage”
The same questions in other papers
Glycine max · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.