Paper · 2017 · International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Response of okra (Abelmuschus esculenthus L. Moench) to combined organic and inorganic foliar fertilizers

A. I. Afe; F. Oluleye

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of combined organic poultry manure (PM) and inorganic foliar fertilizer (FF) on growth and yield of okra (Abelmuschus esculenthus L. Moench). Field trials were carried out at Shao and Teaching and Research Farm of Kwara State University, Malete, respectively, in 2013 and 2014 cropping seasons. The treatment consisted of PM at 10.0 t/ha, combinations of FF with 10.0, 7.5, 5.0, or 2.5 t/ha, FF alone and control without fertilizer arranged in a randomized complete block design and replicated three times. Combinations of PM and FF influenced the growth and fruit yield of okra. PM at 10.0 t/ha plus FF produced the highest plant height of 48.40 and 58.50 cm in 2013 and 2014, respectively. Also, highest number of fruits per plant and fruit yield was obtained at the same treatment over the two years. The control, without fertilizer, showed significantly longer days to flower compared with other treatments in the two years. The highest yield obtained at PM 10.0 t/ha +FF was not significantly different from PM 7.5 t/ha +FF. Hence, poultry manure applied at 7.5 t/ha +FF is therefore recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined poultry manure and foliar fertilizer influenced okra growth and fruit yield.

Treatment
Combinations of PM and FFe0
Outcome
growth and fruit yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combinations of PM and FF influenced the growth and fruit yield of okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 10.0 t/ha plus foliar fertilizer produced the highest okra height, 48.40 cm in 2013.

Treatment
PM at 10.0 t/ha plus FFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
48.40e0
Qualifier
2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PM at 10.0 t/ha plus FF produced the highest plant height of 48.40 and 58.50 cm in 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 10.0 t/ha plus foliar fertilizer produced the highest okra height, 58.50 cm in 2014.

Treatment
PM at 10.0 t/ha plus FFe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
58.50 cme0
Qualifier
2014e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PM at 10.0 t/ha plus FF produced the highest plant height of 48.40 and 58.50 cm in 2013 and 2014, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same manure plus foliar fertilizer treatment yielded the highest fruit number per plant and fruit yield in both years.

Treatment
same treatmente0
Outcome
number of fruits per plant and fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest number of fruits per plant and fruit yield was obtained at the same treatment over the two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The unfertilized control took significantly longer to flower than the fertilizer treatments in both years.

Treatment
without fertilizere0
Outcome
days to flowere0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control, without fertilizer, showed significantly longer days to flower compared with other treatments in the two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield under 10.0 t/ha manure plus foliar fertilizer did not differ significantly from 7.5 t/ha manure plus foliar fertilizer.

Treatment
PM 10.0 t/ha +FFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
PM 7.5 t/ha +FFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield obtained at PM 10.0 t/ha +FF was not significantly different from PM 7.5 t/ha +FF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 7.5 t/ha poultry manure plus foliar fertilizer for okra.

Outcome
poultry manure applied at 7.5 t/ha +FFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“poultry manure applied at 7.5 t/ha +FF is therefore recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–16 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 75 positive, 2 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 112 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

fertilization · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

207 papers: 190 positive, 17 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

203 papers more in this group

See all 207 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 355 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.