Paper · 2017 · Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council

Management of Root Knot Nematode on Tomato through Grafting Root Stock of Solanum sisymbriifolium

Suraj Baidya; Ram Devi Timila; Ram Bahadur KC; et al.

4
claims
12
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp) are difficult to manage once established in the field because of their wide host range, and soil-borne nature. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine the use of resistant root stock of wild brinjal (Solanum sisymbriifolium) to reduce the loss caused by the nematodes on tomato. For the management of root-knot nematodes, grafted plant with resistant root stock of the wild brinjal was tested under farmers’ field conditions at Hemza of Kaski district. Grafted and non-grafted plants were produced in root-knot nematode-free soil. Around three week-old grafted and non-grafted tomato plants were transplanted in four different plastic tunnels where root-knot nematodes had been reported previously. The plants were planted in diagonal position to each other as a pair plot in 80 × 60 cm2 spacing in an average of 20 × 7 m2 plastic tunnels. Galling Index (GI) was recorded three times in five randomly selected plants in each plot at 60 days intervals. The first observation was recorded two months after transplanting. Total fruit yield was recorded from same plants. In the grafted plants, the root system was totally free from gall whereas in an average of 7.5 GI in 0-10 scale was recorded in the non-grafted plants. Fruits were harvested from time to time and cumulated after final harvest to calculate the total fruit yield. It was estimated that on an average tomato fruit yield was significantly (P>0.05) increased by 37 percent in the grafted plants compared with the non-grafted plants. Grafting technology could be used effectively for cultivation of commonly grown varieties, which are susceptible to root-knot nematodes in disease prone areas. This can be used as an alternative technology for reducing the use of hazardous pesticides for enhancing commercial organic tomato production.Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council Vol.3 2017: 27-31

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted tomato roots had no galls, while non-grafted plants averaged 7.5 on the galling index.

Treatment
grafted plantse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne sppMeloidogynee2pathogen
Outcome
root system was totally free from galle0
Direction
totally free from galle0
Qualifier
7.5 GI in 0-10 scalee0
Comparator
non-grafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the grafted plants, the root system was totally free from gall whereas in an average of 7.5 GI in 0-10 scale was recorded in the non-grafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the grafted plants, the root system was totally free from gall whereas in an average of 7.5 GI in 0-10 scale was recorded in the non-grafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1271 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted tomato fruit yield was reported 37 percent higher than non-grafted plants.

Treatment
grafted plantse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne sppMeloidogynee2pathogen
Outcome
tomato fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37 percente0
Comparator
non-grafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato fruit yield was significantly (P>0.05) increased by 37 percent in the grafted plants compared with the non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1546 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomato fruit yield was significantly (P>0.05) increased by 37 percent in the grafted plants compared with the non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1546 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose grafting susceptible tomato varieties in nematode-prone areas.

Outcome
Grafting technology could be used effectively for cultivation of commonly grown varietiese0
Qualifier
disease prone arease0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting technology could be used effectively for cultivation of commonly grown varieties, which are susceptible to root-knot nematodes in disease prone areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting technology could be used effectively for cultivation of commonly grown varieties, which are susceptible to root-knot nematodes in disease prone areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1707 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest grafting to reduce hazardous pesticide use in organic tomato production.

Outcome
reducing the use of hazardous pesticidese0
Qualifier
commercial organic tomato productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This can be used as an alternative technology for reducing the use of hazardous pesticides for enhancing commercial organic tomato production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1850 · show in text ↑
e1

“This can be used as an alternative technology for reducing the use of hazardous pesticides for enhancing commercial organic tomato production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1850 · show in text ↑

grafting · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.