Paper · 2017 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Efficiency of drought tolerance indices under different stress severities for bread wheat selection

Sahar Bennani; Nasserlehaq Nsarellah; Mohammed Jlibene; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
59
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought is a world-wide spread problem adversely affecting bread wheat production in rainfed agro-ecosystems. Development and identification of efficient selection criteria for developing drought tolerant wheat varieties with stable and high yield potential is of paramount importance. This study was carried out to evaluate 24 indices for selecting the best high yielding and drought tolerant cultivars, among 40 bread wheat genotypes, under four levels of stress intensities: no stress, mild (0.25, 0.35) and severe (0.57). The mean productivity (MP), modified stress tolerance index (MSTIk), superiority index (Pi), mean relative performance (MRP), relative efficiency index (REI), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress tolerance index (STI), harmonic mean (HARM) and relative decrease in yield (RDY) showed a high power of discrimination among genotypes, and expressed significant correlations with yields under both stress and non-stressed conditions at all stress intensities. This group of indices was capable to select the highest mean yield associated with the least mean variance at 20 % selection pressure. However, as the stress intensity became greater (>35 %), the efficiency of these indices decreased, especially at high stress intensity (57%), where only Pi and MP were still able to target the highest performances. MRP, REI, GMP, RDY and STI can be used interchangeably. Based on GGE analysis, the best performing genotypes were AUS30355, followed by Gladius, Amir-2 and AUS30354 that showed high yield and stability across all the environments. These genotypes are recommended for direct release and/or for use as parents in the breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed drought indices showed high power of discrimination among genotypes.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
high power of discrimination among genotypese0
Qualifier
at all stress intensitiese0
Comparator
stress and non-stressed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean productivity (MP), modified stress tolerance index (MSTIk), superiority index (Pi), mean relative performance (MRP), relative efficiency index (REI), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress tolerance index (STI), harmonic mean (HARM) and relative decrease in yield (RDY) showed a high power of discrimination among genotypes, and expressed significant correlations with yields under both stress and non-stressed conditions at all stress intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed drought indices showed significant correlations with yields under both stress and non-stressed conditions.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
significant correlations with yields under both stress and non-stressed conditionse0
Qualifier
at all stress intensitiese0
Comparator
stress and non-stressed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean productivity (MP), modified stress tolerance index (MSTIk), superiority index (Pi), mean relative performance (MRP), relative efficiency index (REI), geometric mean productivity (GMP), stress tolerance index (STI), harmonic mean (HARM) and relative decrease in yield (RDY) showed a high power of discrimination among genotypes, and expressed significant correlations with yields under both stress and non-stressed conditions at all stress intensities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These indices selected high mean yield with low mean variance at 20% selection pressure.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
highest mean yield associated with the least mean variancee0
Value
20 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This group of indices was capable to select the highest mean yield associated with the least mean variance at 20 % selection pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1120 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Index efficiency decreased as drought stress exceeded 35%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
efficiency of these indicese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
>35 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as the stress intensity became greater (>35 %), the efficiency of these indices decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 57% stress, only Pi and MP targeted the highest performances.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
target the highest performancese0
Value
57%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high stress intensity (57%), where only Pi and MP were still able to target the highest performances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MRP, REI, GMP, RDY and STI were interchangeable.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
can be used interchangeablye0
Comparator
MRP, REI, GMP, RDY and STIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MRP, REI, GMP, RDY and STI can be used interchangeably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AUS30355 was among the best performers for yield and stability.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
AUS30355e0
Outcome
high yield and stabilitye0
Setting
all the environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best performing genotypes were AUS30355, followed by Gladius, Amir-2 and AUS30354 that showed high yield and stability across all the environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gladius was among the best performers for yield and stability.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Gladiuse0
Outcome
high yield and stabilitye0
Setting
all the environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best performing genotypes were AUS30355, followed by Gladius, Amir-2 and AUS30354 that showed high yield and stability across all the environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amir-2 was among the best performers for yield and stability.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Amir-2e0
Outcome
high yield and stabilitye0
Setting
all the environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best performing genotypes were AUS30355, followed by Gladius, Amir-2 and AUS30354 that showed high yield and stability across all the environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AUS30354 was among the best performers for yield and stability.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
AUS30354e0
Outcome
high yield and stabilitye0
Setting
all the environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best performing genotypes were AUS30355, followed by Gladius, Amir-2 and AUS30354 that showed high yield and stability across all the environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1567 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The selected genotypes were recommended for release or breeding parents.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
direct release and/or for use as parents in the breeding programse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These genotypes are recommended for direct release and/or for use as parents in the breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89 · show in text ↑