Paper · 2017 · Pest Management Science

High tunnels: protection for rather than from insect pests?

Laura L Ingwell; Sarah L Thompson; Ian Kaplan; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High tunnels are a season extension tool creating a hybrid of field and greenhouse growing conditions. High tunnels have recently increased in the USA and thus research on their management is lacking. One purported advantage of these structures is protection from common field pests, but evidence to support this claim is lacking. We compared insect pest populations in high tunnels with field production over two years for three crops: tomato, broccoli and cucumber. RESULTS: Greenhouse pests (e.g. aphids, whiteflies) were more prevalent in high tunnels, compared to field plots. Hornworms (tobacco (Manduca sexta L.) and tomato (M. quinquemaculata Haworth)), a common field pest on tomato, were also more abundant in high tunnels, requiring chemical control while field populations were low. The crucifer caterpillar complex (imported cabbageworm (Pieris rapae L.), diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) and cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni Hübner)) was also more abundant in high tunnels in 2010. Cucumber beetle (striped (Acalymma vittatum F.) and spotted (Diabrotica undecimpunctata Mannerheim)) densities were higher in high tunnels in 2010 and field plots in 2011. CONCLUSION: The common assumption that high tunnels offer protection from field pests was not supported. Instead, high tunnel growing conditions may facilitate higher pest populations. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphids and whiteflies were more prevalent in high tunnels than field plots.

Treatment
high tunnelse0
Interactor
aphids, whitefliesAleyrodoideaAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
Greenhouse pests (e.g. aphids, whiteflies)e0
Direction
more prevalente0
Comparator
field plotse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Greenhouse pests (e.g. aphids, whiteflies) were more prevalent in high tunnels, compared to field plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“insect pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hornworms were more abundant on tomato in high tunnels than field plots.

Treatment
high tunnelse0
Interactor
Hornwormse0pest
Outcome
Hornwormse0
Direction
more abundante0
Comparator
field populationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hornworms (tobacco (Manduca sexta L.) and tomato (M. quinquemaculata Haworth)), a common field pest on tomato, were also more abundant in high tunnels, requiring chemical control while field populations were low.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–806 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The crucifer caterpillar complex was more abundant in high tunnels in 2010.

Treatment
high tunnelse0
Interactor
crucifer caterpillar complexe0pest
Outcome
crucifer caterpillar complexe0
Direction
more abundante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crucifer caterpillar complex (imported cabbageworm (Pieris rapae L.), diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella L.) and cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni Hübner)) was also more abundant in high tunnels in 2010.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–1015 · show in text ↑
e1

“three crops: tomato, broccoli and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber beetle density was higher in high tunnels in 2010.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
high tunnelse0
Interactor
Cucumber beetlee0pest
Outcome
densitiese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in 2010e0
Comparator
field plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber beetle (striped (Acalymma vittatum F.) and spotted (Diabrotica undecimpunctata Mannerheim)) densities were higher in high tunnels in 2010 and field plots in 2011.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber beetle density was higher in field plots in 2011.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
field plotse0
Interactor
Cucumber beetlee0pest
Outcome
densitiese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in 2011e0
Comparator
high tunnelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cucumber beetle (striped (Acalymma vittatum F.) and spotted (Diabrotica undecimpunctata Mannerheim)) densities were higher in high tunnels in 2010 and field plots in 2011.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1187 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that high tunnels did not protect crops from field pests.

Interactor
field pestse0pest
Outcome
protection from field pests was not supportede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The common assumption that high tunnels offer protection from field pests was not supported.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“three crops: tomato, broccoli and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–478 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · pest · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.