Abstract
We sampled 526 dooryard, 18 varietal block, and 784 commercial citrus trees in Florida between May 2009 and Apr 2014 for eriophyoid mites including Diptilomiopus floridanus Craemer & Amrine, Aceria sheldoni (Ewing), Aculops pelekassi (Keifer), and Phyllocoptruta oleivora (Ashmead). In total, 1,423 D. floridanus individuals were collected from dooryard citrus trees and 1 each from the lemon cultivar 'Bearss' and sweet lime trees from the Florida Citrus Arboretum in Winter Haven. Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus in the following counties in Florida: Broward, Collier, Dade, Indian River, Lee, Martin, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, Sarasota, and St. Lucie. The mite was not observed in Charlotte, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Manatee, or Okeechobee counties (Florida). Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%. The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%. In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time. Diptilomiopus floridanus was not collected in commercial citrus orchards during this survey. Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees compared with grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange, and pummelo trees. However, infestation rates on lime and lemon trees were not significantly different from those on sour orange trees.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
1,423 Diptilomiopus floridanus individuals were collected from dooryard citrus trees.
CitrusOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In total, 1,423 D. floridanus individuals were collected from dooryard citrus trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus in eleven Florida counties.
- Interactor
- Diptilomiopus floridanuse2pest
- Outcome
- collectede2
- Setting
- in the following counties in Floridae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus in the following counties in Florida: Broward, Collier, Dade, Indian River, Lee, Martin, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, Sarasota, and St. Lucie”
Claim · model-written summary
Diptilomiopus floridanus was not observed in six Florida counties.
- Interactor
- Diptilomiopus floridanuse2pest
- Outcome
- not observede3
- Setting
- Charlotte, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Manatee, or Okeechobee countiese3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e2“Diptilomiopus floridanus was collected from dooryard citrus”
e3“The mite was not observed in Charlotte, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Manatee, or Okeechobee counties (Florida)”
Claim · model-written summary
Aculops pelekassi made up 3.2% of eriophyoid mites collected from dooryard citrus and varietal blocks.
- Interactor
- A. pelekassiAculops pelekassie4pest
- Outcome
- Percentages of the eriophyoid mite speciese4
- Value
- 3.2%e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e4“Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%”
Claim · model-written summary
Aceria sheldoni made up 9.1% of eriophyoid mites collected from dooryard citrus and varietal blocks.
- Interactor
- A. sheldoni
Aceria sheldonie4pest - Outcome
- Percentages of the eriophyoid mite speciese4
- Value
- 9.1%e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e4“Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%”
Claim · model-written summary
Diptilomiopus floridanus made up 17.3% of eriophyoid mites collected from dooryard citrus and varietal blocks.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e4“Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%”
Claim · model-written summary
Phyllocoptruta oleivora made up 84.2% of eriophyoid mites collected from dooryard citrus and varietal blocks.
- Interactor
- P. oleivora
Phyllocoptruta oleivorae4pest - Outcome
- Percentages of the eriophyoid mite speciese4
- Value
- 84.2%e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e4“Percentages of the eriophyoid mite species collected from dooryard citrus trees and varietal blocks were: A. pelekassi 3.2%, A. sheldoni 9.1%, D. floridanus 17.3%, and P. oleivora 84.2%”
Claim · model-written summary
Collier County had the highest percentage of Diptilomiopus floridanus on dooryard trees, at 36%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e5“The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%”
Claim · model-written summary
Broward County had 25% of dooryard trees infested with Diptilomiopus floridanus.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e5“The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%”
Claim · model-written summary
Indian River County had 25% of dooryard trees with Diptilomiopus floridanus.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e5“The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%”
Claim · model-written summary
Palm Beach County had 25% of dooryard trees with Diptilomiopus floridanus.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e5“The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%”
Claim · model-written summary
Martin County had 23% of dooryard trees with Diptilomiopus floridanus.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e5“The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%”
Claim · model-written summary
St. Lucie County had 22% of dooryard trees with Diptilomiopus floridanus.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e5“The 6 counties with the highest percentages of D. floridanus on dooryard trees were: Collier 36%, Broward 25%, Indian River 25%, Palm Beach 25%, Martin 23%, and St. Lucie 22%”
Claim · model-written summary
In commercial citrus, Aceria sheldoni was collected at less than 1.0% of the time.
- Interactor
- A. sheldoniAceria sheldonie6pest
- Outcome
- collectede6
- Value
- less than 1.0%e6
- Setting
- commercial citruse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e6“In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time”
Claim · model-written summary
In commercial citrus, Aculops pelekassi was collected at 4.0% of the time.
- Interactor
- A. pelekassiAculops pelekassie6pest
- Outcome
- collectede6
- Value
- 4.0%e6
- Setting
- commercial citruse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e6“In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time”
Claim · model-written summary
In commercial citrus, Phyllocoptruta oleivora was collected at 75.5% of the time.
- Interactor
- P. oleivoraPhyllocoptruta oleivorae6pest
- Outcome
- collectede6
- Value
- 75.5%e6
- Setting
- commercial citruse6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e6“In commercial citrus, A. sheldoni was collected less than 1.0%, A. pelekassi 4.0%, and P. oleivora 75.5%, of the time”
Claim · model-written summary
Diptilomiopus floridanus was not collected in commercial citrus orchards during the survey.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e7“Diptilomiopus floridanus was not collected in commercial citrus orchards during this survey”
Claim · model-written summary
Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees than on grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange and pummelo trees.
- Material
- lime and lemone1
- Interactor
- Diptilomiopus floridanuse1pest
- Outcome
- infestation ratese1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Comparator
- grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange, and pummelo treese1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e1“Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees compared with grapefruit, tangerine, tangelo, sweet orange, and pummelo trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Infestation rates on lime and lemon trees were not significantly different from those on sour orange trees.
- Material
- lime and lemon treese2
- Interactor
- Diptilomiopus floridanuse1pest
- Outcome
- infestation ratese2
- Direction
- not significantly differente2
- Comparator
- sour orange treese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“784 commercial citrus trees”
e1“Diptilomiopus floridanus had significantly greater infestation rates on lime and lemon trees”
e2“However, infestation rates on lime and lemon trees were not significantly different from those on sour orange trees”