Paper · 2013 · European Journal of Experimental Biology

Effect of cow dung and variety on the growth and yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)

Gudugi I.A.S.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A trial to investigate the effect of cow dung and inorganic fertilizer on the growth and yield of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) was conducted in the Teaching and Research Farm of Ibrahim Badamsi Babangida University during the 2011 and 2012 cropping seasons. The trial was a factorial experiment consisting of two varieties of Okra (NHe47-4 and LD88-1) and four levels of cow dung (0, 5 10 and 15 tha-1). The inorganic fertilizer was applied at rate of 200kg ha-1. The experiment was fitted into randomized complete block design (RCBD). Cow dung applied at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizer significantly produced taller plants, more leaves and more fruits. Non application of fertilizer significantly delayed flowering. In 2011, cow dung at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizer statistically gave similar fruit weight which was significantly higher than other treatments. The highest fruit weight in 2012 was obtained with cow dung at 20 t ha-1. The varietal difference was not significant in most of the parameters measured

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizer produced taller okra plants.

Treatment
Cow dung applied at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
taller plantse0
Direction
tallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cow dung applied at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizer significantly produced taller plants, more leaves and more fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cow dung at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizer produced more okra leaves and fruits.

Treatment
Cow dung applied at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
more leaves and more fruitse0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cow dung applied at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizer significantly produced taller plants, more leaves and more fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–658 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No fertilizer delayed okra flowering.

Treatment
Non application of fertilizere0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Non application of fertilizer significantly delayed flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, cow dung and inorganic fertilizer gave similarly high fruit weight.

Treatment
cow dung at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizere0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2011e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2011, cow dung at 20 t ha-1 and inorganic fertilizer statistically gave similar fruit weight which was significantly higher than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, cow dung at 20 t ha-1 gave the highest okra fruit weight.

Treatment
cow dung at 20 t ha-1e0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest fruit weight in 2012 was obtained with cow dung at 20 t ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–945 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties did not differ significantly for most measured okra parameters.

Material
NHe47-4 and LD88-1e1
Outcome
most of the parameters measurede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The varietal difference was not significant in most of the parameters measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“two varieties of Okra (NHe47-4 and LD88-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–352 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.