Paper · 2014 · Pure and Applied Biology

Sole and intercropping Sunflower-Mungbean for spring cultivation in Peshawar

Murad Ali Khan

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Yield of some crops performs better in the intercropping than sole cropping system. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) canopy is fragile providing a lot of ground cover, hence, therefore, has a great potential to intercrop with a short stature and/or duration crop making it comparable for the better net return in a cropping system. Field experiment was, therefore, expressly conducted to study the mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in sunflower intercropped on different sowing dates (same sowing date with sunflower, one, two and three weeks delay in sowing from the main sunflower) and rows in combinations (1:1 and 1:2) sunflower-mungbean as intercrop and sole crop of each species for to study yield and yield traits during spring 2011 and 2012 crop growth seasons. Experiments were conducted in randomized complete block design (RCBD), replicated four times at Agronomy Research Farm, the University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan. Data were recorded on plant phenology, yield and yield traits of the main (sunflower) and companion (mungbean) crops. Intercropping did not influence any of the observed morphological traits, yield contributing traits or grain yield of the main sunflower crop. Companion mungbean crop also did not show any advantage (p<0.05) on sole mungbean due to resources competition i.e. solar radiations, nutrients, water and space in the canopy on the ground area. Treatment row combination i.e. 1:1 and 1:2 (sunflower : mungbean) also did not show any advantage in grains yield and/or any of the observed yield trait of mungbean which exhibited sufficient space under the sunflower canopy for mungbean growth and development as additional crop for sustainable soil fertility. Different sowing dates i.e. about a month in delay sowing of intercrop from main sunflower crop did not show any significant (p<0.05) loss in yield or yield contributing traits. The study suggested that mungbean (Cv. Chakwal mung-06) can expectantly be intercropped in sunflower hybrid (Hysun-33) to make it competitive with any other crop of the cropping system in region subject to working on an appropriate planting geometry for sunflower and potential variety of the sunflower to be intercropped.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with mungbean did not change the morphological traits, yield contributing traits or grain yield of sunflower

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
Intercroppinge1
Outcome
morphological traits, yield contributing traits or grain yielde1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
sole crope2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sole and intercropping Sunflower-Mungbean for spring cultivation in Peshawar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Intercropping did not influence any of the observed morphological traits, yield contributing traits or grain yield of the main sunflower crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1193 · show in text ↑
e2

“as intercrop and sole crop of each species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–678 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Companion mungbean showed no advantage over sole mungbean in intercropping with sunflower

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae3
Treatment
intercrope2
Outcome
advantagee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier
due to resources competitione1
Comparator
sole mungbeane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sole and intercropping Sunflower-Mungbean for spring cultivation in Peshawar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Companion mungbean crop also did not show any advantage (p<0.05) on sole mungbean due to resources competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1305 · show in text ↑
e2

“as intercrop and sole crop of each species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–678 · show in text ↑
e3

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:1 and 1:2 sunflower-mungbean row combinations gave no advantage in mungbean grain yield or yield traits

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae4
Treatment
row combination i.e. 1:1 and 1:2 (sunflower : mungbean)e4
Outcome
grains yield and/or any of the observed yield traite4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sole and intercropping Sunflower-Mungbean for spring cultivation in Peshawar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatment row combination i.e. 1:1 and 1:2 (sunflower : mungbean) also did not show any advantage in grains yield and/or any of the observed yield trait of mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying the intercrop sowing by about a month did not significantly reduce yield or yield-contributing traits

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae3
Treatment
delay sowing of intercrope4
Outcome
loss in yield or yield contributing traitse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sole and intercropping Sunflower-Mungbean for spring cultivation in Peshawar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Different sowing dates i.e. about a month in delay sowing of intercrop from main sunflower crop did not show any significant (p<0.05) loss in yield or yield contributing traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1878 · show in text ↑
e3

“mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–425 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean cultivar Chakwal mung-06 can be intercropped in sunflower hybrid Hysun-33 to make the system competitive

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae6
Material
Cv. Chakwal mung-06e6
Outcome
competitive with any other crop of the cropping systeme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sole and intercropping Sunflower-Mungbean for spring cultivation in Peshawar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e6

“The study suggested that mungbean (Cv. Chakwal mung-06) can expectantly be intercropped in sunflower hybrid (Hysun-33) to make it competitive with any other crop of the cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–2064 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

intercropping · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.