Paper · 2017 · Crop and Pasture Science

Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat

Juan J. Olivet; Juana Villalba; Jorge Volpi

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tan spot, caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechs, is a serious constraint on wheat yields in the Southern Cone region of South America. A 2-year experiment was conducted to evaluate fungicide deposition, disease development and grain yield. Three spray nozzles were evaluated: an air-induction flat fan (AI), a wide-angle flat fan (TT), and an extended-range flat fan (XR). A systemic fungicide containing azoxystrobin and cyproconazole was used in both years. Tan spot severity and the area under non-green leaf area disease progress curve (AUNGLA) were analysed. There were no significant differences in deposition among nozzles, and no significant interactions between nozzles and leaf layers in the first year. In both years, AUNGLAs were similar for the three nozzles types, and the tan spot severity in untreated plots was significantly higher than in fungicide-applied plots. Grain yield was higher in the fungicide-applied plots, and there were no significant differences among nozzles in both years. Droplet size had no effect on the fungicide’s efficacy for tan spot control in Uruguay across three susceptible wheat cultivars. The use of drift-reducing nozzles and a systemic fungicide in these trials led to satisfactory performance for spray deposition, canopy penetration and control of the tan spot disease of wheat in the same way as expected from conventional nozzles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant differences in fungicide deposition among spray nozzles in the first year.

Treatment
nozzlese2
Outcome
depositione2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Qualifier
in the first yeare2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“There were no significant differences in deposition among nozzles, and no significant interactions between nozzles and leaf layers in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant interactions between nozzles and leaf layers in the first year.

Treatment
nozzlese2
Outcome
interactions between nozzles and leaf layerse2
Qualifier
in the first yeare2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“There were no significant differences in deposition among nozzles, and no significant interactions between nozzles and leaf layers in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Area under the non-green leaf area disease progress curve was similar for the three nozzle types in both years.

Treatment
three nozzles typese3
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
AUNGLAse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
In both yearse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In both years, AUNGLAs were similar for the three nozzles types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–63 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tan spot severity was significantly higher in untreated wheat plots than in fungicide-applied plots.

Treatment
fungicidee4
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
tan spot severitye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
untreated plotse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“the tan spot severity in untreated plots was significantly higher than in fungicide-applied plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–63 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was higher in the fungicide-applied plots.

Treatment
fungicidee5
Outcome
Grain yielde5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Grain yield was higher in the fungicide-applied plots, and there were no significant differences among nozzles in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield did not differ significantly among spray nozzles in both years.

Treatment
nozzlese5
Outcome
Grain yielde5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Qualifier
in both yearse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Grain yield was higher in the fungicide-applied plots, and there were no significant differences among nozzles in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Droplet size had no effect on the efficacy of the fungicide for tan spot control in Uruguay across three susceptible wheat cultivars.

Material
three susceptible wheat cultivarse6
Treatment
Droplet sizee6
Interactor
Pyrenophora tritici-repentisPyrenophora tritici-repentise1pathogen
Outcome
efficacy for tan spot controle6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Setting
Uruguaye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · InteractorAgronom · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Droplet size had no effect on the fungicide’s efficacy for tan spot control in Uruguay across three susceptible wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1151 · show in text ↑
e1

“caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Died.) Drechs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–63 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of spray nozzles for fungicidal control of tan spot in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Pyrenophora tritici-repentis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.