Paper · 1997 · Journal of Entomological Science

Evaluation of Trap Cropping and Biological Control Against Southern Corn Rootworm (Coleopetera: Chrysomelidae) in Peanuts

M.E. Barbercheck; W.C. Warrick

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field trials to test the efficacy of trap cropping and biological control for the management of Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Barber (Chrysomelidae: Luperini) in peanuts were conducted in 1992, 1993, and 1994. Cucurbita maxima Duchesne cv. ‘Blue Hubbard’ was used as a trap crop for adult beetles and the entomopathogenic nematodes, Steinernema carpocapse Weiser and Steinernema riobravis Cabanillas, Poinar and Raulston, were used as biological control agents against soil-inhabiting larvae. In 1992, peanut yields were highest in treatments that included a trap crop. Trap crop did not affect yield in 1993 or 1994. In 2 out of the 3 years, distribution of pod damage relative to the trap crop suggested that beetles oviposited more frequently in peanuts growing in the row next to the trap crop than in peanuts 3 rows from the trap crop. Although entomopathogenic nematodes persisted for a sufficient period to overlap with the presence of rootworms, they did not affect yield or pod damage in peanuts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap crop treatments had the highest peanut yields in 1992.

Treatment
trap crope0
Interactor
Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardiDiabrotica undecimpunctata howardie1pest
Outcome
peanut yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
1992e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi
Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi · Interactor · picture of the speciesRhododendrites · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1992, peanut yields were highest in treatments that included a trap crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“Diabrotica undecimpunctata howardi Barber (Chrysomelidae: Luperini) in peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap cropping did not affect yield in 1993.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Trap crope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
1993e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trap crop did not affect yield in 1993 or 1994.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Trap Cropping and Biological Control Against Southern Corn Rootworm (Coleopetera: Chrysomelidae) in Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap cropping did not affect yield in 1994.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Trap crope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
1994e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trap crop did not affect yield in 1993 or 1994.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Trap Cropping and Biological Control Against Southern Corn Rootworm (Coleopetera: Chrysomelidae) in Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod damage distribution suggested more beetle oviposition beside the trap crop than three rows away in two of three years.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Interactor
beetlesColeopterae0pest
Outcome
beetles ovipositede0
Direction
more frequentlye0
Value
2 out of the 3 yearse0
Comparator
peanuts 3 rows from the trap crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2 out of the 3 years, distribution of pod damage relative to the trap crop suggested that beetles oviposited more frequently in peanuts growing in the row next to the trap crop than in peanuts 3 rows from the trap crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–845 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Entomopathogenic nematodes persisted long enough to overlap with rootworms.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeat0
Interactor
rootwormse0pest
Second interactor
entomopathogenic nematodese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
entomopathogenic nematodes persistede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“entomopathogenic nematodes persisted for a sufficient period to overlap with the presence of rootworms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Evaluation of Trap Cropping and Biological Control Against Southern Corn Rootworm (Coleopetera: Chrysomelidae) in Peanuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Entomopathogenic nematodes did not affect peanut yield.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
entomopathogenic nematodese0
Interactor
rootwormse0pest
Second interactor
entomopathogenic nematodese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“entomopathogenic nematodes persisted for a sufficient period to overlap with the presence of rootworms, they did not affect yield or pod damage in peanuts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1010 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Entomopathogenic nematodes did not affect peanut pod damage.

Taxon
peanutsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
entomopathogenic nematodese0
Interactor
rootwormse0pest
Second interactor
entomopathogenic nematodese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“entomopathogenic nematodes persisted for a sufficient period to overlap with the presence of rootworms, they did not affect yield or pod damage in peanuts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1010 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

biocontrol · pest · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.