Paper · 2006 · TSpace (University of Toronto)

Evaluación de doce variedades de caña de azúcar (Sacharum spp.) bajo condiciones de secano en un suelo de sabana del oeste del estado Monagas, Venezuela (Evaluation of twelve sugarcane (Sacharum spp.) varieties under dryland conditions on a savanna soil of Monagas State West, Venezuela)

Miguelina Marcano; Moraima García; Luisa Caraballo

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Twelve sugarcane varieties were evaluated under dryland conditions on a sandy loam soil from the tropical dry forest located at west Monagas State, Venezuela, in order to select highly adapted varieties to that environment. The experiment was set up under a completely randomised block design, with three replications; The experimental plots consisted on three furrows, 1,5 m apart and 10 m length. Planting was made al the beginning of the rainy season. The evaluated varieties were: PR 61-632, JA 64-19, B 75-49, B 75-226, V 72-11, V 74-7, V 71-68, V 75-6, B 75-403, B 64-278, C 323-68 and C 1057-73. The trial was conducted for three seasons, and the fertilization rate plan was made taking into account the soil analysis and the plant requirements, for each seasons. The total phosphorus dose was applied at planting time, the nitrogen and potassium were splitted in three doses applied at: planting time, 45 and 90 days after planting. The plots were harvested after twelve months. Variables evaluated were: Tons of cane for hectare (TCH); Pol cane percent (PPC); Tons of Pol per hectare (TPH) and Efficiency (EF). According to the statistical analysis (Tukey Mean Separation Test) the outstanding varieties with respect TCH and TPH were: PR 61-632 and C 323-68. Most of the varieties were statically similar regarding to equals to PPC and EF means. V 75 - 6 reached the highest yield for PPC (15,6) and it also was the most efficient, while B 75-49 gave the lowest PPC yield and the least efficiency among all the varieties in the trial.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR 61-632 and C 323-68 were outstanding for TCH.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Material
PR 61-632 and C 323-68e0
Outcome
TCHe0
Direction
outstandinge0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“the outstanding varieties with respect TCH and TPH were: PR 61-632 and C 323-68”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1266 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PR 61-632 and C 323-68 were outstanding for TPH.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Material
PR 61-632 and C 323-68e0
Outcome
TPHe0
Direction
outstandinge0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“the outstanding varieties with respect TCH and TPH were: PR 61-632 and C 323-68”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1266 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most varieties had statistically similar PPC means.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Outcome
PPCe0
Direction
statically similare0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most of the varieties were statically similar regarding to equals to PPC and EF means.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most varieties had statistically similar EF means.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Outcome
EFe0
Direction
statically similare0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“Most of the varieties were statically similar regarding to equals to PPC and EF means.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V 75 - 6 had highest PPC among trial varieties.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Material
V 75 - 6e0
Outcome
PPCe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15,6e0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“V 75 - 6 reached the highest yield for PPC (15,6) and it also was the most efficient, while B 75-49 gave the lowest PPC yield and the least efficiency among all the varieties in the trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1543 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V 75 - 6 had most efficient most efficient among trial varieties.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Material
V 75 - 6e0
Outcome
most efficiente0
Direction
most efficiente0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“V 75 - 6 reached the highest yield for PPC (15,6) and it also was the most efficient, while B 75-49 gave the lowest PPC yield and the least efficiency among all the varieties in the trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1543 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B 75-49 had lowest PPC among trial varieties.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Material
B 75-49e0
Outcome
PPCe0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“V 75 - 6 reached the highest yield for PPC (15,6) and it also was the most efficient, while B 75-49 gave the lowest PPC yield and the least efficiency among all the varieties in the trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1543 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B 75-49 had least efficiency least efficiency among trial varieties.

Taxon
sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)t0
Material
B 75-49e0
Outcome
least efficiencye0
Direction
least efficiencye0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane (Sacharum spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 175–200 · show in text ↑
e0

“V 75 - 6 reached the highest yield for PPC (15,6) and it also was the most efficient, while B 75-49 gave the lowest PPC yield and the least efficiency among all the varieties in the trial.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1543 · show in text ↑