Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Variation in Productivity and Energy Use in Rice-Wheat System under Different Establishment Methods

Sh weta; Manu Malik; S.K. Saini; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Conventional crop establishment methods such as puddled transplanting in rice-wheat system in the Indo-Gangetic plains (IGP) require a large amount of water and labor, both of which are increasingly becoming scarce and expensive. Efforts have been made to evaluate alternate crops establishment methods, which are more efficient in. A field experiment was conducted for two years to evaluate various crop planting methods in rice- wheat system for their efficiency in labor, water and energy use and economic profitability. The result revealed that rice were recorded statistically equal yields of in conventional puddle, hand transplanting, machine transplanting, direct seeding of sprouted rice and dry seed methods. The difference between wheat establishments methods were significant, puddle transplanting requires 35-40 % more irrigation water than no tillage direct seeded rice. In first year, mechanical transplanting (MT) rice had a higher net return than the direct seeded rice, where as in second year, direct seeded rice had a higher net return as compared to other treatments. The study showed that the conventional practice of puddle transplanting could be replaced with direct seeded methods to save inputs. However, the occurrence and distribution of rainfall during the cropping season had considerable influence on the savings in irrigation water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yields were statistically equal across five establishment methods.

Treatment
hand transplanting, machine transplanting, direct seeding of sprouted rice and dry seed methodse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
statistically equale0
Comparator
conventional puddlee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice were recorded statistically equal yields of in conventional puddle, hand transplanting, machine transplanting, direct seeding of sprouted rice and dry seed methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddle transplanting required 35-40 % more irrigation water than no tillage direct seeding.

Treatment
puddle transplantinge0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
moree0
Value
35-40 %e0
Comparator
no tillage direct seeded ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“puddle transplanting requires 35-40 % more irrigation water than no tillage direct seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical transplanting produced higher rice net returns than direct seeding in year one.

Treatment
mechanical transplanting (MT)e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
first yeare0
Comparator
direct seeded ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In first year, mechanical transplanting (MT) rice had a higher net return than the direct seeded rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–986 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seeding produced higher rice net returns than other treatments in year two.

Treatment
direct seedede0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
second yeare0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in second year, direct seeded rice had a higher net return as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1087 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude direct seeding can replace puddle transplanting to save inputs.

Outcome
replaced with direct seeded methods to save inputse0
Comparator
puddle transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the conventional practice of puddle transplanting could be replaced with direct seeded methods to save inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1220 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall timing and distribution influenced irrigation water savings.

Outcome
savings in irrigation watere0
Qualifier
occurrence and distribution of rainfall during the cropping seasone0
Setting
cropping seasone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice-Wheat System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–61 · show in text ↑
e0

“the occurrence and distribution of rainfall during the cropping season had considerable influence on the savings in irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1363 · show in text ↑

tillage · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

transplanting · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 66 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.