Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development

Effect of in-situ Moisture Conservation Methods on Productivity in North Eastern Ghat Zone of Odisha

S.K. Behera; D.K. Bastia; A. Mishra

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study was conducted in the Budhadani village of Kandhamal District in north eastern ghat zone of Odisha under the National Innovations on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) programme of AICRP for Dry Land Agriculture, Phulbani, Odisha during kharif 2014 and 2015. Budhadani village always experiences scarce and erratic monsoon rainfall during kharif season. Practice of sole cropping was predominant in this area and often resulted in low yields or sometimes crop failure due to erratic monsoon rainfall. In such areas, in-situ moisture conservation methods and intercropping system are feasible options to minimize risk in crop production and ensure reasonable returns. The study was conducted for the cropping system as such sole maize, maize + cowpea (2:2) intercropping and maize + pigeon pea (2:2) intercropping system. In this experiment, three in-situ moisture conservation methods such as (i) summer ploughing, (ii) increase bund height and (iii) both summer ploughing and increase bund height were compared with the control treatment with no moisture conservation measures. Among the different moisture conservation methods, summer ploughing with increased bund height resulted in higher yield as compared to control treatment and other moisture conservation methods. Intercropping of rainfed crops such as maize + cowpea and maize + pigeon pea is an important risk minimizing strategy for drought proofing in the scarce rainfall zones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer ploughing with increased bund height gave higher yield than the control and the other moisture conservation methods.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
summer ploughing with increased bund heighte1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
control treatment and other moisture conservation methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sole maize, maize + cowpea (2:2) intercropping and maize + pigeon pea (2:2) intercropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–831 · show in text ↑
e1

“summer ploughing with increased bund height resulted in higher yield as compared to control treatment and other moisture conservation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1283 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping rainfed maize with cowpea or pigeon pea is an important risk-minimizing strategy for drought proofing in scarce-rainfall zones.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
risk minimizing strategy for drought proofinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping of rainfed crops such as maize + cowpea and maize + pigeon pea is an important risk minimizing strategy for drought proofing in the scarce rainfall zones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1452 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.