Abstract
The study was conducted in direct seeded and transplanted rice at at Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Rice Research Station, Kaul during 2014 and 2015 with objective to study the effect of crop establishment methods on incidence of insect pest. The pooled data on incidence of foliage feeders revealed less than one per cent damage in direct seeding and transplanting rice throughout the season during both the years and did not differ significantly. The population of Rice gundhi bug, Leptocorisa acuta varied from 0.08 to 0.16/ hill in direct seeding and 0.10 to 0.12/ hill in transplanted in different weeks during 2014. The population count ranged from 0.14 to 0.22/ hill and 0.10 to 0.16/ hill in direct seeding and transplanting during 2015. The population difference in two methods of study was found non-significant during both the seasons. The population of Leptocorisa acuta with biotic and abiotic factor had non-significant association during both the years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Foliage feeder damage stayed below one per cent in both direct seeded and transplanted rice, with no significant difference.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- direct seedinge0
- Interactor
- foliage feederst0pest
- Outcome
- damagee0
- Direction
- did not differe0
- Value
- less than one per cente0
- Comparator
- transplanting ricee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“less than one per cent damage in direct seeding and transplanting rice throughout the season during both the years and did not differ significantly”
t0“foliage feeders and Leptocorisa acuta in rice”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2014 Leptocorisa acuta counts ranged 0.08 to 0.16 per hill in directly seeded rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- direct seedinge0
- Interactor
- Leptocorisa acuta
Leptocorisa acutae0pestt0 - Outcome
- population of Rice gundhi bug, Leptocorisa acutae0
- Value
- 0.08 to 0.16/ hille0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of Rice gundhi bug, Leptocorisa acuta varied from 0.08 to 0.16/ hill in direct seeding”
t0“Leptocorisa acuta in rice”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2014 Leptocorisa acuta counts ranged 0.10 to 0.12 per hill in transplanted rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- transplantede0
- Interactor
- Leptocorisa acutaLeptocorisa acutat0pest
- Outcome
- Leptocorisa acutat0
- Value
- 0.10 to 0.12/ hille0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“0.10 to 0.12/ hill in transplanted in different weeks during 2014”
t0“Leptocorisa acuta in rice”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2015 Leptocorisa acuta counts ranged 0.14 to 0.22 per hill in directly seeded rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- direct seedinge0
- Interactor
- Leptocorisa acutaLeptocorisa acutat0pest
- Outcome
- population counte0
- Value
- 0.14 to 0.22/ hille0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population count ranged from 0.14 to 0.22/ hill and 0.10 to 0.16/ hill in direct seeding and transplanting during 2015”
t0“Leptocorisa acuta in rice”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2015 Leptocorisa acuta counts ranged 0.10 to 0.16 per hill in transplanted rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- transplantinge0
- Interactor
- Leptocorisa acutaLeptocorisa acutat0pest
- Outcome
- population counte0
- Value
- 0.10 to 0.16/ hille0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population count ranged from 0.14 to 0.22/ hill and 0.10 to 0.16/ hill in direct seeding and transplanting during 2015”
t0“Leptocorisa acuta in rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Leptocorisa acuta populations did not differ significantly between establishment methods in either year.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- direct seedinge0
- Interactor
- Leptocorisa acutaLeptocorisa acutat0pest
- Outcome
- population differencee0
- Comparator
- transplantinge0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population count ranged from 0.14 to 0.22/ hill and 0.10 to 0.16/ hill in direct seeding and transplanting during 2015. The population difference in two methods of study was found non-significant during both the seasons”
t0“Crop establishment impact on foliage feeders and Leptocorisa acuta in rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Leptocorisa acuta population had no significant association with biotic and abiotic factors in either year.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Interactor
- Leptocorisa acutaLeptocorisa acutae0pestt0
- Outcome
- population of Leptocorisa acutae0
- Qualifier
- biotic and abiotic factore0
- Setting
- during both the yearse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The population of Leptocorisa acuta with biotic and abiotic factor had non-significant association during both the years”
t0“Leptocorisa acuta in rice”
The same questions in other papers
transplanting · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.