Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Actinobacteria and Pseudomonas spp. against Sclerotium rolfsii in Groundnut

K.P. Roopa; P.U. Krishnaraj

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Groundnut or peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is one of the important economic oilseed crops of the world. Among various soil borne pathogens, Sclerotium rolfsii causing southern blight is of most important, causing huge losses in groundnut. The Sclerotium rolfsii culture was obtained from Department of Biotechnology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad. The identification and confirmation of the isolate was done by cultural characteristics, pathogenicity test. In in vitro studies plant growth promoting rhizobacteria viz., actinobacteria and pseudomonas spp. were used. Initially, 257 actinobacteria and 134 Pseudomonas isolates were screened against S. rolfsii. Out of these isolates, nine isolates showed significant inhibition of pathogen and these isolates were further selected for in vivo evaluation under greenhouse conditions S. rolfsii. Percent disease incidence and percent disease control were recorded. Under challenge inoculation with S. rolfsii, the Pseudomonas isolate, AUDP 48 showed significant control of the southern blight disease compared to other rhizobacteria. Growth parameters such as shoot length, root length and total fresh and dry weight are also observed far superior in this treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine screened bacterial isolates significantly inhibited S. rolfsii in vitro.

Taxon
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0
Outcome
significant inhibition of pathogene0
Value
nine isolatese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · TaxonEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initially, 257 actinobacteria and 134 Pseudomonas isolates were screened against S. rolfsii. Out of these isolates, nine isolates showed significant inhibition of pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas isolate AUDP 48 significantly controlled southern blight on groundnut relative to other rhizobacteria.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas isolate, AUDP 48e0
Interactor
S. rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
Pseudomonas isolate, AUDP 48e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
southern blight diseasee0
Direction
controle0
Comparator
other rhizobacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under challenge inoculation with S. rolfsii, the Pseudomonas isolate, AUDP 48 showed significant control of the southern blight disease compared to other rhizobacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AUDP 48 treatment gave superior shoot and root lengths and fresh and dry weights.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Pseudomonas isolate, AUDP 48e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas isolate, AUDP 48e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot length, root length and total fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
far superiore0
Comparator
other rhizobacteriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth parameters such as shoot length, root length and total fresh and dry weight are also observed far superior in this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Pseudomonas isolate, AUDP 48 showed significant control of the southern blight disease compared to other rhizobacteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1094 · show in text ↑
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–85 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · Agroathelia rolfsii · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.