Paper · 2017 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

Modern High-Yielding Maize, Wheat and Soybean Cultivars in Response to Gypsum and Lime Application on No-Till Oxisol

Douglas Dalla Nora; Telmo Jorge Carneiro Amado; Rodrigo da Silveira Nicoloso; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
60
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars are usually characterized by a short cycle, high shoot-root ratio, and high responsiveness to nutrient input. Continuous no-tillage management (NTS) frequently leads to a steep gradient in soil chemical quality with depth, thus decreasing yield under conditions of acid subsoil and water stress. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of gypsum, applied separately or in combination with lime, on the yield of cultivars used in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The study consisted of four experiments conducted on a typic Hapludox under NTS. The experiment was arranged in a randomized block design with three replications. Experiments I and II were carried out on soils with a satisfactory chemical soil quality and tested treatments of gypsum applications ranging from 0.0 to 6.5 Mg ha-1. The other experiments were carried out on acid soil (experiment III) and a soil with an abrupt drop in chemical quality (experiment IV). Experiment III was arranged in a split plot design, where plots corresponded to gypsum rates between 0.0 and 5.0 Mg ha-1, and subplots to two lime rates (0.0 and 2.0 Mg ha-1). Experiment IV was conducted in a split plot design, with plots consisting of gypsum rates from 0.0 to 6.0 Mg ha-1 and subplots of lime rates from 0.0 to 4.8 Mg ha-1. Of a set of 17 harvests investigated during the experimental period, 82 % responded with yield increases to gypsum and lime inputs. The gypsum rate that induced the highest grain yield was high (4.7 Mg ha-1) and similarly, the maximum technical efficiency of lime was higher than the currently recommended. Furthermore, the combined application of lime and gypsum increased yield. There was a correlation between grain yield with the chemical quality of the soil layer 0.25-0.40 m in experiment I, 0.00-0.40 m in experiment II, and the 0.00-0.25 m in experiment IV. Only in experiment III, where the surface layer was acidic, the diagnostic layer usually sampled (0.00-0.10 m) was correlated with grain yield. Therefore, the use of the 0.00-0.25 m soil layer with critical base saturation values of 65 % and maximum Al saturation of 5 % could improve the current recommendations for soil correction. To exploit the yield potential of modern grain cultivars on dystrophic Oxisol, the formation of a thicker layer with high chemical quality is an efficient strategy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 82 % of 17 harvests, yield of modern maize, wheat and soybean cultivars increased in response to gypsum and lime inputs on no-till Oxisol.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
gypsum and lime inputse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
82 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“Of a set of 17 harvests investigated during the experimental period, 82 % responded with yield increases to gypsum and lime inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gypsum rate that gave the highest grain yield of the maize, wheat and soybean cultivars was high, 4.7 Mg ha-1.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
gypsum ratee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.7 Mg ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“The gypsum rate that induced the highest grain yield was high (4.7 Mg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum technical efficiency of lime for the cultivars was higher than the currently recommended level.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Outcome
maximum technical efficiency of limee1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maximum technical efficiency of lime was higher than the currently recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application of lime and gypsum increased the yield of the cultivars.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Treatment
combined application of lime and gypsume1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“the combined application of lime and gypsum increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1700 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield correlated with the chemical quality of the 0.25-0.40 m soil layer in experiment I, the 0.00-0.40 m layer in experiment II and the 0.00-0.25 m layer in experiment IV.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Setting
experiment Ie1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a correlation between grain yield with the chemical quality of the soil layer 0.25-0.40 m in experiment I, 0.00-0.40 m in experiment II, and the 0.00-0.25 m in experiment IV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1885 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only in experiment III, with an acidic surface layer, the usually sampled 0.00-0.10 m diagnostic layer was correlated with grain yield.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Setting
experiment IIIe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“Only in experiment III, where the surface layer was acidic, the diagnostic layer usually sampled (0.00-0.10 m) was correlated with grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2029 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that using the 0.00-0.25 m soil layer with critical base saturation of 65 % and maximum Al saturation of 5 % could improve current soil correction recommendations.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Outcome
use of the 0.00-0.25 m soil layer with critical base saturation values of 65 % and maximum Al saturation of 5 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of the 0.00-0.25 m soil layer with critical base saturation values of 65 % and maximum Al saturation of 5 % could improve the current recommendations for soil correction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2042–2219 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that forming a thicker soil layer of high chemical quality is an efficient strategy to exploit the yield potential of modern grain cultivars on dystrophic Oxisol.

Taxon
maize, wheat, and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse0
Outcome
formation of a thicker layer with high chemical qualitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modern maize, wheat, and soybean cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“the formation of a thicker layer with high chemical quality is an efficient strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2300–2384 · show in text ↑

gypsum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

gypsum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

gypsum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

lime · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 108 positive, 33 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.