Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Plant Population and Fertilizer Doses on Yield Attributes, Yield and Economics of Summer Groundnut

B.D. Waghmode; A.S. Kambale; V.C. Navhale; et al.

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Shirgaon, Ratnagiri (MS) on the lateritic soil during Rabi 2013-14 to 2015-16 to study effect of plant population and fertilizer doses on growth and yield of summer groundnut. The treatment comprises four main plot treatments of planting geometry and three sub-plot treatments of levels of fertilizer replicated three times in split plot design. Groundnut cultivar, TKG Bold sown with planting geometry 20 X 10 cm (plant population @ 5 lakhs ha-1) with application of 125% RDF level noticed significantly highest pod, kernel and haulm yield of groundnut, which was followed by planting geometry 25 X 10 cm (plant population @ 4.0 lakhs ha-1), 30 X 10 cm (plant population @ 3.33 lakhs ha-1) and 30 X 15 cm (plant population @ 2.22 lakhs ha-1) with same fertilizer level i.e.125% RDF. The groundnut cultivar, TKG Bold sown with planting geometry 30 x15 cm (Plant Population of 2.22 lakhs ha-1) and fertilized with 125% RDF level (P1F3) recoded significantly highest number of pods plant-1 and pod weight plant-1 over rest of treatment combinations. However, the highest benefit to cost ratio was observed in planting geometry 30 X 15 cm with 125% RDF level (P1F3).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting geometry 20 X 10 cm with 125% RDF gave the significantly highest pod, kernel and haulm yield of groundnut, compared with planting geometry 25 X 10 cm.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Material
TKG Bolde1
Treatment
planting geometry 20 X 10 cm (plant population @ 5 lakhs ha-1) with application of 125% RDF levele1
Outcome
pod, kernel and haulm yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
planting geometry 25 X 10 cme2
Setting
Agricultural Research Station, Shirgaon, Ratnagiri (MS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–108 · show in text ↑
e0

“A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Shirgaon, Ratnagiri (MS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“Groundnut cultivar, TKG Bold sown with planting geometry 20 X 10 cm (plant population @ 5 lakhs ha-1) with application of 125% RDF level noticed significantly highest pod, kernel and haulm yield of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–620 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was followed by planting geometry 25 X 10 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting geometry 30 x15 cm with 125% RDF gave the significantly highest number of pods per plant and pod weight per plant over the other treatment combinations.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae3
Material
TKG Bolde3
Treatment
planting geometry 30 x15 cm (Plant Population of 2.22 lakhs ha-1) and fertilized with 125% RDF level (P1F3)e3
Outcome
number of pods plant-1 and pod weight plant-1e3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
rest of treatment combinationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–108 · show in text ↑
e3

“The groundnut cultivar, TKG Bold sown with planting geometry 30 x15 cm (Plant Population of 2.22 lakhs ha-1) and fertilized with 125% RDF level (P1F3) recoded significantly highest number of pods plant-1 and pod weight plant-1 over rest of treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting geometry 30 X 15 cm with 125% RDF gave the highest benefit to cost ratio.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae5
Treatment
planting geometry 30 X 15 cm with 125% RDF level (P1F3)e4
Outcome
benefit to cost ratioe4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“summer groundnut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 92–108 · show in text ↑
e4

“the highest benefit to cost ratio was observed in planting geometry 30 X 15 cm with 125% RDF level (P1F3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1229 · show in text ↑
e5

“to study effect of plant population and fertilizer doses on growth and yield of summer groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 145–241 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 87 positive, 15 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.