Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Weed Management on Weed Dynamics and Yield of Machine Sown Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (l.) Millsp.] Under Dryland Conditions

P. Kathirvelan

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in rainfed alfisol at Dryland Agricultural Research Station Experimental Farm, Chettinad during Kharif 2013 and 2014 season, to find out the effect of different weed management practices in machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2) under dry land conditions. The experiment consisted of following treatments viz., power weeder weeding once at 20 DAS, power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS, power weeder weeding once at 20 DAS + one hand weeding, power weeder weeding twice (20 DAS and 40 DAS) + one hand weeding, mulching with cumbu napier trash @ 5 t/ha, imazethapyr @ 50 g a.i ha-1 and quizalofop ethyl @ 50 g a.i ha-1 at 15 DAS, hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and these treatments were compared with unweeded control. The trial was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. The results revealed that power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weeding effectively controlled all kinds of weed flora which were present in both inter and intra row spacing which reflected in higher mean grain yield of 922 kg ha-1 which might be due to better weed control as reflected in lower weed density (12.1), weed dry weight (14.5) and higher weed control efficiency (WCE) of 79.5 per cent. Early post emergence application of imazethapyr @ 50 g a.i ha-1 at 15 DAS had effectively controlled broad leaved weeds and sedges whereas, quizalofop ethyl @ 50 g a.i ha-1 at 15 DAS was effective against grasses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice using a power weeder plus hand weeding controlled interrow and intrarow weed flora.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Material
VBN 2e1
Treatment
power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weedinge0
Interactor
weed florae0weed
Outcome
weed florae0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weeding effectively controlled all kinds of weed flora which were present in both inter and intra row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated power and hand weeding produced higher mean grain yield of 922 kg ha-1.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weedinge0
Outcome
mean grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
922 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weeding effectively controlled all kinds of weed flora which were present in both inter and intra row spacing which reflected in higher mean grain yield of 922 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1095 · show in text ↑
e1

“machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated power and hand weeding yielded lower weed density of 12.1.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane2
Treatment
power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weedinge1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
12.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower weed density (12.1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1179 · show in text ↑
e1

“power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–935 · show in text ↑
e2

“machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated power and hand weeding yielded lower weed dry weight of 14.5.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane3
Treatment
power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weedinge2
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte0
Direction
lowere1
Value
14.5e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed dry weight (14.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1203 · show in text ↑
e1

“lower weed density (12.1), weed dry weight (14.5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1203 · show in text ↑
e2

“power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–935 · show in text ↑
e3

“machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated power and hand weeding produced weed control efficiency of 79.5 per cent.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane2
Treatment
power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weedinge1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
79.5 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher weed control efficiency (WCE) of 79.5 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1261 · show in text ↑
e1

“power weeder weeding twice at 20 and 40 DAS in integration with one hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–935 · show in text ↑
e2

“machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr effectively controlled broad-leaved weeds and sedges.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
imazethapyr @ 50 g a.i ha-1 at 15 DASe0
Interactor
broad leaved weeds and sedgese0weed
Outcome
broad leaved weeds and sedgese0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early post emergence application of imazethapyr @ 50 g a.i ha-1 at 15 DAS had effectively controlled broad leaved weeds and sedges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1393 · show in text ↑
e1

“machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop ethyl was effective against grasses.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
quizalofop ethyl @ 50 g a.i ha-1 at 15 DASe0
Interactor
grassese0weed
Outcome
effective against grassese0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quizalofop ethyl @ 50 g a.i ha-1 at 15 DAS was effective against grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“machine sown pigeon pea (var. VBN 2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–259 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

herbicide · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.