Paper · 2017 · Ecology and Evolution

Do large‐seeded herbs have a small range size? The seed mass–distribution range trade‐off hypothesis

Judit Sonkoly; Balázs Deák; Orsolya Valkó; et al.

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
37
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We aimed to introduce and test the "seed mass-distribution range trade-off" hypothesis, that is, that range size is negatively related to seed mass due to the generally better dispersal ability of smaller seeds. Studying the effects of environmental factors on the seed mass and range size of species, we also aimed to identify habitats where species may be at risk and need extra conservation effort to avoid local extinctions. We collected data for seed mass, global range size, and indicators for environmental factors of the habitat for 1,600 species of the Pannonian Ecoregion (Central Europe) from the literature. We tested the relationship between species' seed mass, range size, and indicator values for soil moisture, light intensity, and nutrient supply. We found that seed mass is negatively correlated with range size; thus, a seed mass-distribution range trade-off was validated based on the studied large species pool. We found increasing seed mass with decreasing light intensity and increasing nutrient availability, but decreasing seed mass with increasing soil moisture. Range size increased with increasing soil moisture and nutrient supply, but decreased with increasing light intensity. Our results supported the hypothesis that there is a trade-off between seed mass and distribution range. We found that species of habitats characterized by low soil moisture and nutrient values but high light intensity values have small range size. This emphasizes that species of dry, infertile habitats, such as dry grasslands, could be more vulnerable to habitat fragmentation or degradation than species of wet and fertile habitats. The remarkably high number of species and the use of global distribution range in our study support our understanding of global biogeographic processes and patterns that are essential in defining conservation priorities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed mass was negatively correlated with range size.

Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
range sizee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“seed mass is negatively correlated with range size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–829 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed mass increased as light intensity decreased.

Outcome
seed masse0
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
light intensitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increasing seed mass with decreasing light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–994 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed mass increased with nutrient availability.

Outcome
seed masse0e1
Direction
increasinge0
Setting
nutrient availabilitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“increasing nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1031 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed mass with decreasing light intensity and increasing nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1031 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed mass decreased with increasing soil moisture.

Outcome
seed masse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Setting
soil moisturee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing seed mass with increasing soil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Range size increased with increasing soil moisture.

Outcome
Range sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
soil moisturee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Range size increased with increasing soil moisture and nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1159 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Range size increased with nutrient supply.

Outcome
Range sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
nutrient supplye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Range size increased with increasing soil moisture and nutrient supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1159 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Range size decreased with increasing light intensity.

Outcome
Range sizee0e1
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
light intensitye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“decreased with increasing light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“Range size increased with increasing soil moisture and nutrient supply, but decreased with increasing light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1206 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species in dry, nutrient-poor, high-light habitats had small ranges.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
small range sizee0
Direction
smalle0
Setting
habitats characterized by low soil moisture and nutrient values but high light intensity valuese0

Verbatim

e0

“species of habitats characterized by low soil moisture and nutrient values but high light intensity values have small range size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1455 · show in text ↑