Paper · 2017 · New Phytologist

Caterpillars induce jasmonates in flowers and alter plant responses to a second attacker

Lucille T. S. Chrétien; Anja David; Eirini Daikou; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In nature, herbivorous insects and plant pathogens are generally abundant when plants are flowering. Thus, plants face a diversity of attackers during their reproductive phase. Plant responses to one attacker can interfere with responses to a second attacker, and phytohormones that orchestrate plant reproduction are also involved in resistance to insect and pathogen attack. We quantified phytohormonal responses of flowering plants exposed to single or dual attack and studied resistance mechanisms of plants in the flowering stage. Flowering Brassica nigra were exposed to either a chewing caterpillar, a phloem-feeding aphid or a bacterial pathogen, and plant hormonal responses were compared with dual attack situations. We quantified phytohormones in inflorescences and leaves, and determined the consequences of hormonal changes for components of direct and indirect plant resistance. Caterpillars were the main inducers of jasmonates in inflorescences, and the phytohormonal profile of leaves was not affected by either insect or pathogen attack. Dual attack increased plant resistance to caterpillars, but compromised resistance to aphids. Parasitoid performance was negatively correlated with the performance of their hosts. We conclude that plants prioritize resistance of reproductive tissues over vegetative tissues, and that a chewing herbivore species is the main driver of responses in flowering B. nigra.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caterpillars were the main inducers of inflorescence jasmonates.

Taxon
Brassica nigraBrassica nigrat0
Treatment
Caterpillarse0
Interactor
Caterpillarse0herbivore
Outcome
jasmonates in inflorescencese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica nigra
Brassica nigra · TaxonMagnus Manske · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Caterpillars were the main inducers of jasmonates in inflorescences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flowering Brassica nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phytohormonal profiles were unaffected by insect or pathogen attack.

Taxon
Brassica nigraBrassica nigrat0
Treatment
insect or pathogen attacke0
Outcome
phytohormonal profile of leavese0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica nigra
Brassica nigra · TaxonMagnus Manske · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phytohormonal profile of leaves was not affected by either insect or pathogen attack.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flowering Brassica nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual attack raised resistance to caterpillars.

Taxon
Brassica nigraBrassica nigrat0
Treatment
Dual attacke0
Interactor
caterpillarse0herbivore
Outcome
plant resistance to caterpillarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica nigra
Brassica nigra · TaxonMagnus Manske · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dual attack increased plant resistance to caterpillars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1110 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flowering Brassica nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual attack compromised resistance to aphids.

Taxon
Brassica nigraBrassica nigrat0
Treatment
Dual attacke1
Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
resistance to aphidse0
Direction
compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica nigra
Brassica nigra · TaxonMagnus Manske · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but compromised resistance to aphids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flowering Brassica nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dual attack increased plant resistance to caterpillars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid performance was negatively correlated with host performance.

Taxon
Brassica nigraBrassica nigrat0
Interactor
caterpillarse1herbivoree0
Outcome
Parasitoid performancee0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica nigra
Brassica nigra · TaxonMagnus Manske · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Parasitoid performance was negatively correlated with the performance of their hosts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flowering Brassica nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–560 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dual attack increased plant resistance to caterpillars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1110 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer priority for reproductive tissue resistance.

Taxon
Brassica nigraBrassica nigrat0
Organ / stage
reproductive tissuese0
Outcome
resistance of reproductive tissuese0
Qualifier
over vegetative tissuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica nigra
Brassica nigra · TaxonMagnus Manske · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants prioritize resistance of reproductive tissues over vegetative tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1329 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flowering Brassica nigra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–560 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer a chewing herbivore mainly drives flowering-plant responses.

Taxon
B. nigraBrassica nigrae0
Interactor
chewing herbivore speciese0herbivore
Outcome
responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica nigra
Brassica nigra · TaxonMagnus Manske · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a chewing herbivore species is the main driver of responses in flowering B. nigra.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1422 · show in text ↑