Paper · 2017 · Ecology

Symbioses with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria: nodulation and phylogenetic data across legume genera

Michelle E. Afkhami; D. Luke Mahler; Jean H. Burns; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

How species interactions shape global biodiversity and influence diversification is a central - but also data-hungry - question in evolutionary ecology. Microbially based mutualisms are widespread and could cause diversification by ameliorating stress and thus allowing organisms to colonize and adapt to otherwise unsuitable habitats. Yet the role of these interactions in generating species diversity has received limited attention, especially across large taxonomic groups. In the massive angiosperm family Leguminosae, plants often associate with root-nodulating bacteria that ameliorate nutrient stress by fixing atmospheric nitrogen. These symbioses are ecologically-important interactions, influencing community assembly, diversity, and succession, contributing ~100-290 million tons of N annually to natural ecosystems, and enhancing growth of agronomically-important forage and crop plants worldwide. In recent work attempting to determine whether mutualism with N-fixing bacteria led to increased diversification across legumes, we were unable to definitively resolve the relationship between diversification and nodulation. We did, however, succeed in compiling a very large searchable, analysis-ready database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera (98% of Leguminosae genera; LPWG 2017), which, along with associated phylogenetic information, will provide a valuable resource for future work addressing this question and others. For each legume genus, we provide information about the species richness, frequency of nodulation, subfamily association, and topological correspondence with an additional data set of 100 phylogenetic trees curated for database compatibility. We found 386 legume genera were confirmed nodulators (i.e., all species examined for nodulation nodulated), 116 were non-nodulating, four were variable (i.e., containing both confirmed nodulators and confirmed non-nodulators), and 243 had not been examined for nodulation in published studies. Interestingly, data exploration revealed that nodulating legume genera are ~3 × more species-rich than non-nodulating genera, but we did not find evidence that this difference in diversity was due to differences in net diversification rate. Our metadata file describes in more detail the structure of these data that provide a foundational resource for future work as more nodulation data become available, and as greater phylogenetic resolution of this ca. 19,500-species family comes into focus. We release this data set under the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution-ShareAlike License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). The data may be used, distributed, and reproduced with proper citation of this article.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors compiled a searchable nodulation database for 749 legume genera with associated phylogenetic information.

Taxon
legume generae1
Outcome
database of nodulation datae1
Value
749 legume generae1

Verbatim

e1

“database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

386 legume genera were confirmed nodulators.

Taxon
legume generae1
Outcome
confirmed nodulatorse2
Value
386e2

Verbatim

e1

“database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1262 · show in text ↑
e2

“We found 386 legume genera were confirmed nodulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1739 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

116 legume genera were non-nodulating.

Taxon
legume generae1
Outcome
non-nodulatinge3
Value
116e3

Verbatim

e1

“database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1262 · show in text ↑
e3

“116 were non-nodulating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1818 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four legume genera had variable nodulation, containing both confirmed nodulators and non-nodulators.

Taxon
legume generae1
Outcome
variablee4
Value
foure4

Verbatim

e1

“database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1262 · show in text ↑
e4

“four were variable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1820–1838 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

243 legume genera had not been examined for nodulation in published studies.

Taxon
legume generae1
Outcome
had not been examined for nodulatione5
Value
243e5

Verbatim

e1

“database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1262 · show in text ↑
e5

“243 had not been examined for nodulation in published studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1918–1979 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodulating legume genera have about three times more species than non-nodulating genera.

Taxon
legume generae1
Outcome
species-riche6
Direction
moree6
Value
~3 ×e6
Comparator
non-nodulating generae6

Verbatim

e1

“database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1262 · show in text ↑
e6

“nodulating legume genera are ~3 × more species-rich than non-nodulating genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2027–2105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors found no evidence that the richness difference between nodulating and non-nodulating legume genera reflects net diversification rate.

Taxon
legume generae1
Outcome
net diversification ratee7

Verbatim

e1

“database of nodulation data for 749 legume genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1262 · show in text ↑
e7

“we did not find evidence that this difference in diversity was due to differences in net diversification rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2111–2220 · show in text ↑